All Posts (29300)

Sort by

Sarah Palin is Pro-God and Pro-Life. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IR3HdyeXRo

The morally challenged continuously say that she does not get it but this film shows that she not only does get it but that those who accuse her of not getting it are themselves bewildered about the purpose of life and their reason for living.  They don't get the meaning of life at all.  Is it no wonder that the decisions coming out of Congress and the White House do not resolve the problems of our country.  Any one who is willing to deny God and/or is willing to abort an innocent baby simply cannot be trusted to make decisions that will have good results for this Republic and its citizens.  How in the world can one vote for those who do not understand that abortion is murder...if someone believes that harming an innocent, helpless, unborn baby is ok then extend that reasoning to the decision making process of these people after they get into office and commence making decisions that affect our lives.  Is it no wonder this country is in a mess.  Decisions that are made without the concern for their moral implications can only and ultimately cause tremendous collateral damage.  Take for example a Board of Directors whose members are morally challenged when they decide to move a factory to China when they understand full well the implications of that decision will result in devastation of a multitude of families that had ties to that factory.  This destruction of families does not seem to be of any concern to these morally challenged people.  Those who make decision based on Judaeo-Christian morality will not move those factories to China.  They will find ways of resolving their competitive issues and remain here in the U.S.  Sure it may mean that the Executives will not make more millions or that management and labor may have to make a little less money until they resolve their competitive issues but the decision was a morally based one which did not profoundly hurt a multitude of families.  The same reasoning may be applied to those we elect to Congress and the WHAT House.  Those who are morally challenged will not make decisions that ultimately and finally benefit the American public.  By electing morally challenged people we are committing social and financial suicide.  When will the people begin  to understand that someone who does not care about morality will not care what mal-effect their decisions will have upon you the constituent.  We Americans need to wake up and smell the roses of moral reality and face up to the un-reality of the morally challenged!

Read more…

California! California! California!

Wake up you Idiots!Recently a Texas delegation came to California with a mission to lure private businesses away from California and to make there new home in the business friendly state of Texas. O! And they where successful. So successful that they are planning to up their efforts in an ongoing campaign to capitalize on California's failed economy, corrupt unions, corrupt local and state legislature and very unfriendly business environment. The poor relationship between the state and private enterprise has been going on for years and it took this "depression" to put it in full awareness.O! Wake up. Nobody in California reported on it. I would have thought the great and almighty Governor you elected would be on top of this. O! You must of forgot he did not do anything the last time he was in office. Quite trying to make it in Hollywood and wake up!!!!!!
Read more…


                                   

                                                             All You'll Ever Need to Know 

                                       About Big Government Interference:







     Pythagorean theorem:......................24 words.

 

     Lord's prayer:..................................66 words.

 

     Archimedes' Principle:.....................67 words.
 

     Ten Commandments:........................179 words.

 

     Gettysburg Address:.......................286 words.
 

     Declaration of Independence:..........1,300 words.

 

     US Constitution with all 27 Amendments:........7,818 words.

 

     US Government regulations on sale of cabbage:….......26,911 words.
 
     Obamacare . . . . . . . . . 2,773 PAGES
 
 
Read more…


  

 
           Obamacare . . . created 384 brand new government agencies – roughly 9.6 times as many as big spending Franklin Delano Roosevelt created during twelve years-plus in the Oval Office.”
 
 
Warns of Impending European Crisis
 
The George Soros-inspired International Monetary Fund (IMF) cut its forecast for U.S. economic growth Friday while warning Washington and debt-ridden European countries they are “playing with fire” unless they immediately begin to reduce their budget deficits. World economic recovery, the IMF says, is severely threatened if Europe’s regional debt woes would spill over into global financial markets.
It trimmed its forecast for 2011 worldwide growth, from 4.4 per cent to a still optimistic 4.3 per cent, due to weakness in the US and fallout from Japan’s “tsunami disaster” at present the U.S. is growing at a rate close to 2.1%. Since Japan is America’s chief auto and electronics competitor, Rajjpuut would guess that except for the ongoing Obama “near-depression,” Japan’s troubles should objectively be an opportunity for undisputed and powerful American growth which should have been sufficient to counter Japan’s huge problems following the three-headed earthquake-tsunami-nuclear disaster . . . but led by the input of multi-billionaire currency-manipulator George Soros, the IMF updated its World Economic Outlook , noting deepening market fears of a slowdown in the United States, the world’s largest economy where a persistent struggle with high unemployment seems to rival a twenty-year collapse in Japan’s economy even before the three-pronged spear was driven into the country’s gut. Soros could be right, led by Barack Obama, America seems intent on killing business and all hope of economic recovery on its shores.
Meanwhile the “Fund” remained very upbeat about the Australian and Southeast Asian area’s potential for growth but emphasized that setbacks in Europe could have serious consequences for the entire world. In Asia, the IMF was very upbeat and held its 2011 growth forecasts for China and India (the worlds #1 and #2 major “developing economies”) at 9.6% and 8.2% respectively.
After Greece warned it might default unless bailed out again, IMF chief economist Olivier Blanchard was pessimistic about the long-term outlook for “peripheral” European countries. Greece’s credit rating was recently downgraded by Standard and Poors to make its debt the worst in the world even below Ecuador.   “They have very high debt, very large deficits and very low growth, and so there’s absolutely no question it’s going to take a very long time for them to return to health,” according to Mr. Blanchard.   Blanchard also dismissed all thought of a “double-dip” U.S. recession. Back on our own shores, however, it appears that despite the golf game with House Speaker John Boehner, Barack Obama is NOT opposed to a significant American meltdown that would fulfill “his handler and chief campaign financier” Soros’s desired collapse of the American dollar presumably doubling his net worth.
            Mr. Obama has shown no indication he wants to reduce America’s national debt; trim its ongoing budget and budget deficits; deal intelligently with our own three-pronged entitlement fiasco (Medicare, Social Security and the federal side of Medicaid); nor has any inclination to repeal his great spending and government-interference boondoggle: Obamacare. Obamacare, while just one 2,770 page law, created 384 brand new government agencies – roughly 9.6 times as many as big spending Franklin Delano Roosevelt created in his twelve years-plus in the Oval Office.
 
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
 
 
 
Read more…

Beyond bluster to action

Part of the frustration of both sides of the issues of importance to the continuation of this Nation is the lack of any action.  We hear. all the time, that the other side is foolish and they have no clue, that their ideas will bring the end to this Nation, as we know it.  Words, we hear them all the time.  America needs no more words.  Every person, who even remotely cares about anything and the majority who could care less have heard all about it.  The sheer volume of words and finger pointing and accusations lead to complete inaction as this Nation falls apart.  There are consequences to every action, or inaction.  We must put aside all the differences, (in the grander scheme of things, they sure seem petty).  Enough talk, time for action.  Everyone must start from a common ground.  Regardless of HOW we get there, I am sure all will agree that America borrows much more than it takes in and this cannot continue.  One more point of common ground would be caring about this nation and its continued existence.  Politicians, on both sides, will talk and point fingers and accuse the other of any number of inhuman acts and will continue to do this while America falls completely.  When this nation has become part of say, China, who will they point fingers at?  The Chinese will simply execute them to shut them up.  Enough talk.......actually do something.
Read more…

Barack Obama’s 10 Commandments of War

 

By John W. Lillpop


President Obama’s actions in dealing with the crisis in Libya have revealed much about his progressive approach to war, near-war, and humanitarian intervention.

The Barack Obama 10 Commandments of War:


1. One must never call an intervention “war,” particularly when that is exactly what it is.

2. The contemplated use of American military force is always subject to approval by the United Nations Security Council.

3. Rulings made by the United Nations trump the will of the U.S. Congress.

4. The only thing worse than starting a war is actually winning one.

5. Surrender is the only “exit strategy” a progressive president will ever need.

6. Braggadocio about the U.S. military being the best and “number one” is no longer appropriate in this, the era of post-American Exceptionalism.

7. Because the U.S. military is no longer exceptional, Americans forces must never take the lead when only the best will do.

8. Gloating over military victory is in very poor taste and can lead to hurt feelings among the defeated. Better to apologize and promise to make diplomacy work next time.

9. Congressional pre-approval is always a Constitutional requirement—when the president is Republican.

10. Killing and maiming civilians is justifiable only when a president is engaged in humanitarian intervention to prevent the killing and maiming of citizens,but only after approval by the UN.
Read more…

Beware the Hazards of Clinical Liberalism

 

liberal-idiot.jpg









 
 
Satire by John W. Lillpop

Recognizing when one’s mind has been infested with clinical liberalism is vital information that one must be aware of order to survive in an ever-increasingly dangerous world where liberals are tolerated, even encouraged, in some quarters.

This simple, yet scientific, test has been programmed to evaluate “liberal quotient,” which is the exact opposite of intelligence quotient, and normally portends serious mental and moral defects.

The test:

1. Abortion

A. The privacy provision in the U.S. Constitution was authored by:

( ) Roe V. Wade, one of the original founding fathers
( ) Sandra Day O’Connor
( ) Paid lobbyists for Planned Parenthood and Code Pink

B. Abortions should be:

( ) Mandatory for all unmarried women.
( ) Included in universal health care coverage paid for by the government.
( ) Funded by eliminating the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.

2. Global War on Terror

The war on terror is:

( ) A term that deeply offends Muslims and should, therefore, be expunged from all government communications.
( ) Lost: The terrorists have won and America should surrender immediately.
( ) Yet another failed policy of George W. Bush, which has been inherited.

3. Taxes

Higher taxes:

( ) Stimulate economic growth and create millions of secure, high paying jobs.
( ) Are needed to keep overachievers modestly modest
( ) Should be paid by any family with an annual income in excess of $7,450

4. Energy and Dependence on Foreign Oil

A. Drilling for new oil reserves in America is:

( ) Prohibited by the U.S. Constitution.
( ) Sure to irritate Muslim leaders whom Obama should be working with, rather than against.
( ) Unnecessary if automobiles are outlawed.

B. Additional refining capacity would:

( ) Increase demand, thereby causing more global warming.
( ) Be the moral equivalent of the Holocaust.
( ) Be OK in blue states if built by brown illegal aliens.

C. The best option for dealing with the high cost of gasoline is to:

( ) Ignore it. Americans drive too much as it is.
( ) Raise gasoline taxes $5.50 per gallon to reduce demand.
( ) Cut off supplies to Red states.


5. Illegal Immigration

A. Illegal immigration is:

( ) Needed by liberals in order to win elections.
( ) A misnomer. They are actually undocumented Democrats!
( ) Mexico’s chief export.

B. Border security should be:

( ) Ignored, because we need cheap lettuce.
( ) Ignored, because we need cheap lettuce and more Democrats.
( ) Put on hold until the Obama Administration fixes Afghanistan.

C. The fence between the United States and Mexico is:

( ) Unconstitutional. It discriminates against Mexicans too fat to scale a fence.
( ) A good idea if it will stop the Minutemen from invading Mexico.

D. Obama’s proposed immigration reform scheme:

( ) Will work if guest workers are required to join a labor union.
( ) Sounds like amnesty, but Mexicans here illegally deserve amnesty!

E. Janet Napolitano, Home Land Security Boss and a Democrat

( ) Thinks ‘’Minutemen’’ is a reference to the sexual staying power of Border Patrol agents.
( ) Believes that the 12-40 million people who have ignored our borders and invaded America are “Newly Arrived Refugees” who deserve respect and a path to citizenship

6. Liberal Understanding of Islam

A. Ramadan:

( ) Is a scared Muslim ritual that has been commercialized into a national hotel chain—Ramada Inn—by greedy American capitalists.
( ) Is not covered by constitutional separation of church and
state, because the founding fathers were all Christian Caucasians.

B. The Koran:

( ) Should be required reading in U.S. schools starting in Kindergarten
( ) Was used in the second swearing-in procedure for Barack Obama to the presidency
( ) Is needed to counter Judeo-Christian propaganda found in the Bible.

C. Mosques:

( ) Are holy sanctuaries, except when used to plot nuclear attacks against Israel.
( ) Are never used to hide weapons, except during time of war. Because of infidels, Islam has always been, and will always be, at war.

D. The practice of rewarding martyrs with 72 virgins:

( ) Makes far more sense that the Christian myth about a virgin giving birth to a Jew come to save the world.
( ) Assures that Allah will always have a large contingent of dedicated, virile young men eager to give their very lives for the righteous cause of Islam.


Congratulations! You have successfully completed this objective assessment of your vulnerability as a practicing liberal.

Because we understand that self-esteem and confidence are very fragile commodities to liberals, we provide neither answers nor grades to this test. This is essential to protect those who may have performed poorly.

But rest assured that you did GREAT-- like everyone else, regardless of sex, nationality, race, language, sexual preference, age, blah, blah, blah!
Read more…

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on The Gateway Pundit-By Jim Hoft-On June 15, 2011:

“It’s not just Bill Ayers…

In October 2010 FBI agents raided the homes of far left activists in Chicago and Minneapolis who were linked to the Marxist FARC terrorists and Islamic radicals as part of a terrorism investigation.

The home of radical Hatem Abudayyeh, a friend of Barack Obama, was raided in the terror sweep.

Radical Hatem Abudayyeh protested against Israel in Chicago in January 2009. (Daylife)

Hatem Abudayyeh is the executive director of the Arab American Action Network (AAAN). Hatem Abudayyeh has been with the Arab American Action Network (AAAN) since 1999, and was appointed Executive Director in 2003.

The Arab American Action Network was founded by former PLO operative and close Obama family friend Rashid Khalidi. Obama was a director of the Woods Fund from 1994 through 2001, when the board approved a $40,000 grant to the Arab American Action Network.

In 2003 Barack Obama was an honored guest at a dinner sponsored by the AAAN for former PLO-operative Rashid Khalidi.

During the dinner a video was taken that shows Barack Obama celebrating with members of this Palestinian group who are openly hostile towards Israel. Barack Obama even gave a toast to a Rashid Khalidi at this going away party. The LA Times will not release the video from this Jew-bashing dinner.

Not only was Hatem Abudayyeh’s radical organization given $40,000 by Barack Obama and the Woods Fund but his organization also collected nearly half a million in taxpayer money.

The Obama Administration invited Abudayyeh to the White House last year.

Stanley Kurtz at The Corner reported this week that the FBI is still investigating this radical Obama associate:

“Today’s Washington Post features a story by Peter Wallsten (the reporter who obtained the Obama-Khalidi video tape) noting that, under the direction of U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, the FBI is investigating prominent peace activists and labor organizers for possible ties to terrorism. According to Wallsten, some of the investigation’s targets include “Chicagoans who crossed paths with Obama when he was a young state senator.” This includes, for example, according to Wallsten, Hatem Abudayyeh, executive director of the Arab American Action Network, founded by Rashid Khalidi. (I tell the story of Obama’s ties to AAAN here.) According to the search warrants, investigators are tracking possible “material support” for “Columbian and Palestinian groups designated by the U.S. government as terrorists.” Wallsten suggests that the probe might be awkward for Obama, given his need for support from some of the leftist and labor groups involved.

This is just an investigation, of course, and all so-called targets should be presumed innocent. Also, the activists themselves are crying foul, with the help of close Obama ally, Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky (D-IL). It’s important to protect the right of political dissent. At the same time, support for terrorism is a legitimate target of investigation.”

Source:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/06/good-grief-radical-obama-pal-who-was-awarded-457000-in-taxpayer-funds-has-visited-white-house-is-being-investigated-for-ties-to-terrorism/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+gatewaypundit2+%28Gateway+Pundit%29

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. The L.A. Times Suppresses Obama’s Khalidi Bash Tape!-Posted on National Review Online-By ANDREW C. McCARTHY-On October 27, 2008:

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/226104/i-l-times-i-suppresses-obamas-khalidi-bash-tape/andrew-c-mccarthy

II. Obama and a White House invite for dictator who has stolen billions from his impoverished African nation!-Posted on The Daily Mail-By DANIEL BATES-On June 9, 2011:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2001593/Barack-Obama-invites-Gabon-dictator-Ali-Bongo-White-House.html

III.  Is Our President A Terrorist?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-fmtJ5kh-50#at=2334

IV. Canada Turns Away Obama’s Terrorist Pal, Bill Ayers!-Posted on The Blaze-By Mike Opelka, The Blaze-On June 16, 2011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/canada-turns-away-obamas-old-pal-1960s-domestic-terrorist-bill-ayers/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

What we haven’t been told about the President’s background!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/what-we-haven’t-been-told-about-the-president’s-background/

Sen. Obama’s Radical Islamic Past and Ties To Terrorist Groups:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/17/sen_obamas_radical_islamic_past_and_ties_to_terrorist_groups.thtml

What Was The Chicago Annenberg Challenge?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/22/what_was_the_chicago_annenberg_challenge.thtml

Why is Obama Handing Out Millions of Dollars to Terrorist?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/why-is-obama-handing-out-millions-of-dollars-to-terrorists/

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

Is President Obama in on the Uprising in Egypt?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/is-president-obama-in-on-the-uprising-in-egypt/

Is Israel the next Arab Facebook Campaign?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/30/is-israel-the-next-arab-facebook-campaign/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Pawlenty Red Flags: Right Online Minnesota

Former Governor of Minnesota, Tim Pawlenty gave a great Tea Party conservative speech at Right Online this afternoon.  I am from Colorado so all I know about Pawlenty I have learned within the last 6 months or so.  I applauded loudly and whooped as he SPOKE all the right words.  He is fiery, he is smart, yada yada.  The problem is that his constituents in Minnesota, the real Conservative constituents, don't trust him.  An unnamed source who had worked on campaigns at different levels in Minnesota described him as a compromiser, a RINO, a politician by nature, one who talks the Tea Party talk but does not walk the Tea Party walk. 

 

I asked the unnamed source about Michelle Bachmann, the US Rep from Minnesota.  This seemingly well versed and credible Minnasotan described Bachmann's rise through the political ranks, first as a business owner, tax litigation attorney, pro-life activist (Phyllis Schafley)and education reform advocate.  Bachmann was asked by many supporters to run for public office, which, initially she did not want to do.  But she ran and beat a RINO in her primary race, and beat an establishment dem to win a seat in the Minnesota State Senatenational race.  She then went on to run for the United States House of Representatives and beat an extreme-left dem. Michelle Bachmann, it is said, is hated by the RINOs and the Dems in Minnesota, which in the mind of most Tea Party members, makes her imminently qualified for high office.  I love a woman who makes enemies of corrupt, dishonest, musty, dusty establishment politicians.  Thank you (name withheld)

Read more about Right Online at

http://reagangirl.com

Read more…

Posted on CNSNews.com-By Penny Starr-On June 16, 2011:

(CNSNews.com)Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D.-Texas) likened “Christian militants” to Islamic radicals in a hearing of the House Homeland Security Committee on Wednesday, suggesting they posed a comparable threat to the rule of law in the United States.

At the same hearing, a witness told the committee that the conversion of U.S. prison inmates to radical Islam is an “evolving threat” to national security.

Michael Downing, the head of counter-terrorism and special operations at the Los Angeles Police Department, was one of three witnesses who testified at the hearing on Muslim radicalization called by Rep. Peter King, a New York Republican.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBAmPxSI8bo&feature=player_embedded

But Democrats on the committee condemned the proceedings as “racist” because of its focus on Muslims. They said the hearing should focus on broader issues, including gangs, unfair sentencing practices that target young black men, and other extremists, including white supremacists.

King rebuffed those criticisms, telling Democrats that they controlled the Homeland Security Committee for four years, yet they did not call one hearing on any of the issues they claimed should be part of Wednesday’s hearing.

“Suddenly this issue emerges when we start talking about Muslim radicalization,” King said. “The purpose of this committee is to combat Islamic terrorism because that is the terrorist threat to this country,” King said.

In his prepared testimony, the LAPD’s Downing said nearly 300 people are spending time in federal prisons on terrorism-related charges, including nearly two dozen al-Qaeda-linked terrorists who were involved in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, the 1998 East African embassy bombings, the 1999 millennial plot to bomb the Los Angeles International Airport and the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole.

Another witness testified that many prison inmates who are jailed for lower-level crimes emerge from prison “committed to Jihad” because of their contact with Muslim inmates.

“Every one of them, while incarcerated, was exposed to extremist ideology through literature, visitors, volunteers, and clergy with ties to terrorist organizations or extremists and/or known terrorists who were also doing time in prison,” said Patrick Dunleavy, retired deputy inspector general with the criminal intelligence unit at New York Department of Correctional Services.

Rep. Laura Richardson (D-Calif.) grilled Dunleavy on the definition of the world “radicalize” and said that “various groups,” including white supremacists, also have been radicalized in U.S. prisons.

Richardson criticized the hearing for focusing only on Muslim radicalization: “I actually believe that the focus of one particular group on the basis of race or religion can be deemed as racist and as discriminatory.” 

She said a hearing singling out one group on the basis of race or religion “is flawed and should not be done in the House of Representatives.”

But Rep. King, the committee chair, said he “disagreed 100 percent” with Richardson. He noted that the Homeland Security Committee was formed to investigate terrorist threats following the attack by radical Islamists on Sept. 11, 2001.

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee expressed “angst” about the hearing and compared radicalized Muslims to what she called “radical Christian militants.”

Jackson Lee cited the case of Verne Jay Merrell, one of three men described by prosecutors as “extremist” and “paramilitary,” who was sentenced to life in prison for setting off bombs near a Spokane, Washington, newspaper office and an abortion clinic.

Jackson Lee described Merrell as a “Christian militant.”

“Mr. Dunleavy, are you familiar with the Christian militant?”

“Yes I am,” Dunleavy answered.

“Can one say that they might possibly want to undermine this country?” Jackson Lee asked. “Because right now, constitutionally, the right for women to choose (abortion) is a constitutional right.

“People disagree with it, but here’s an individual attempting to undermine the protections that are given to women,” Jackson Lee continued. “Would you suggest that that might be compared to trying to undermine this country? That’s a possibility, is it not?”

Dunleavy responded that anyone who kills in the name of God is an ideologue, but that he did not believe Christian militants were connected to foreign groups that pose a threat to U.S. security.

“I don’t think that’s the issue,” Jackson Lee said. “The issue is whether or not their intent is to undermine the laws of this country. And I think it is clear that that is the case,” she said.”

Source:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/democrats-compare-islamic-radicals-white

Note: What follows is a C-SPAN video of the House Homeland Security Committee that was held on June 15, 2011, which was the second in a series of hearings on Islamic radicalization in the United States. 

The Committee focused on prison radicalization, including discussions on various cases from the States of New York and California involving the radicalization of prisoners. 

Witnesses for the hearing included Patrick Dunleavy, Former Deputy Inspector, Criminal Intelligence Unit, New York Department of Correctional Services; Kevin Smith, former assistant U.S. Attorney, Central District of California; and Michael Downing, Deputy Chief and Commanding Officer, Counterterrorism and Special Operations Bureau, Los Angeles Police Department:

Lawmakers Review Islamic Radicalization in Prisons!-Posted on C-SPAN.org-On June 15, 2011: 

http://www.c-span.org/Events/Lawmakers-Review-Islamic-Radicalization-in-Prisons/10737422285-1/

Note What follows is the CSPAN video of Congressman King’s First Panel Hearing on the “Radicalization in The U.S. Muslim Community, Islamic  Organizations”, which was held on March 10, 2011.

The Los Angeles County sheriff and Islamic community representatives testified at a House Homeland Security hearing on the threat of radicalization among U.S. Muslims. Chairman Peter King defended the controversial hearing and pushed back against critics saying that there was nothing un-American about the hearings despite their focus only on a religious minority:

Radicalization in The U.S. Muslim Community, Islamic Organizations!-Posted on C-SPANVideo.org-On March 10, 2011:

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/USMusli

Note: What follows is the CSPAN Video of the hearing held on April 13, 2011 by the House Subcommittee on Terrorism, Human Intelligence, Analysis and Counterintelligence that heard thought provoking testimony from several analysts from policy organizations that offered their opinions as to what kind of governments would be formed in the aftermath of the uprisings across the Middle East and North Africa in an attempt of examining the future political landscape as groups, such as the Muslim Brotherhood, compete for power there. The House Subcommittee also heard eye opening and disturbing testimony from these analysts regarding what should be of the utmost concern with the Muslim Brotherhood within the U.S.-You Decide:

Hearing Examines Role of Muslim Brotherhood in Middle East Politics-Posted on CSPAN Video-On April 13, 2011:

http://ww.c-span.org/Events/Hearing-Examined-the-Role-of-Muslim-Brotherhood-in-Middle-East-Politics/10737420863-1/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this issue-You Decide:

I. Weiner’s In-Laws and the Secret Muslim Brotherhood Connections Revealed!-Posted on FloydReports.com-By Walid Shoebat and Ben Barrack-On June 15, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/weiners-in-laws-and-the-secret-muslim-brotherhood-connections-revealed/

II. Islamic education on the rise in US!-Posted on MSNBC-By Kari Huus, Reporter-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43331744/ns/us_news-life/t/islamic-education-rise-us-struggle-acceptance/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

What are CAIRs obstructionist goals?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/6951/

The Islamic Infiltration: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/15/the-islamic-infiltration-inside-our-government-armed-with-our-secrets/

Shocking New Report! Obama’s Real Terrorists: Targeting Patriots and The Right!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/shocking-new-report-obamas-real-terrorists-targeting-patriots-and-the-right/

Should Americans Fear Islam?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/should-americans-fear-islam/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

 “Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Posted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Goodenough-On June 17, 2011:

(CNSNews.com) – The U.N. General Assembly is set to pass a resolution on Friday afternoon that will retain Israel as the only country out of 192 member-states to be the target of a dedicated permanent item on the agenda of the U.N. Human Rights Council.

The move comes two days after an Obama administration official gave a speech saying that its deeper engagement with the United Nations has helped to counter the body’s anti-Israel bias.

The General Assembly vote will ensure that, as the Geneva-based Human Rights Council (HRC) approaches its sixth year, its disproportionate focus on Israel will remain. The resolution adopts the outcome of a five-year review which the U.S. and other mostly Western democracies had hoped would improve the council by removing some of the identified faults.

However, two of the most glaring flaws – the skewed attention paid to Israel and the absence of enforceable criteria for HRC membership – will remain unchanged.

The HRC has ten permanent items on its agenda, ranging from “organizational and procedural matters” (item one) to “technical assistance and capacity-building” (item ten).

Only two of the 10 items deal with specific human rights situations. One, item four, is entitled “Human rights situations that require the council’s attention,” potentially covering situation across the entire globe.

The other, item seven, deals with the “human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories.”

The resolution to be voted on in New York on Friday maintains that anomaly.

Agenda item seven was back on the table on Tuesday in Geneva, where the council is wrapping its 17th regular three-week session.

During the debate, Israel repeatedly was condemned by Arab and Islamic states and their allies – which continue to dominate the council – including some countries which themselves face charges of responding violently to dissent.

Syrian ambassador Faysal Khabbaz Hamoui accused Israel of “war crimes and crimes against humanity” and “state terrorism. Iran drew attention to the “Zionist regime’s” policies regarding detention and imprisonment of “political prisoners.” Bahrain alleged “deliberate killings” of unarmed Palestinians.

Pakistan, speaking on behalf of the Islamic bloc, cited “continuous flagrant violations” of Palestinians’ right to life and self-determination, while Cuba complained that Israel demonstrated a lack of respect for the U.N. by ignoring its recommendations.

Others criticizing Israel included Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Jordan, Turkey, Egypt, Sudan, Morocco and Kuwait. Common themes included last year’s flotilla incident and the recent deadly clashes along the disputed Israeli-Syria border.

In response, Israeli envoy Aharon Leshno-Yaar said that amid the turmoil and change in the Arab world, the HRC still appeared to be “mired” in the issue of Israel. His country was clearly not before the council because of any current burning human rights need, he added.

During contributions by non-governmental organizations, Hillel Neuer of the Geneva-based NGO U.N. Watch rebuked the council for focusing on Israel at a time “when citizens were being “persecuted or massacred by their own governments, in Syria, Iran, Yemen, Libya, Bahrain and elsewhere.”

“History will record that at a time when citizens across the Middle East were being attacked by their own government – by rifles, tanks, and helicopters – the U.N. focused its scarce time and attention on a country in that region where this is not happening; the only country in the region which, despite its flaws, respects the right to peaceful assembly, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion …” he said.

(A number of members of the HRC on Wednesday signed up to a statement condemning human rights violations in Syria. The statement was delivered by the Canadian envoy on behalf of 54 countries.)

'Egregious'

The Obama administration, which reversed its predecessor’s policy and joined the HRC in 2009, has been fending off calls to reduce U.S. contributions to the United Nations.

As part of this campaign, Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Esther Brimmer delivered a speech Wednesday highlighting the administration’s efforts to counter bias against Israel at the U.N. and the HRC.

Before the U.S. joined the council, she told the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, far too much of its attention focused on Israel, while far too little attention was “directed to the world’s most troubling and urgent human rights situations.”

The U.S. took its seat on the council for the first time in June 2009, at the start of its 11th regular session.

Before then, the HRC had held nine emergency “special sessions” relating to rights abuses in specific countries, five of them dedicated to Israel. Since the U.S. joined, the council has held a further four special sessions dealing with specific countries, one of them on Israel.

The HRC has passed a total of 79 resolutions relating to specific countries, according to statistics kept by the Hudson Institute’s Eye on the U.N. project. Of the 79, almost half (38) deal with Israel, while the rest relate to situations in 15 other countries. Of the 38 dealing with Israel, 14 were passed after the U.S. joined.

Brimmer conceded that the council remains flawed.

“We continue to protest the egregious permanent agenda item on Israel,” she said. “But we have managed to use every opportunity to shift the focus of the debate at the council addressing the most serious human rights abusers, rather than unfairly singling out Israel.”

Source:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/un-human-rights-council-retaining-its-bi

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Senators Challenge Obama on Foreign Policy on Israel!-Posted on Israel National News-By Elad Benari-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/144942#replies

II. Obama Inspired Ship to Join IHH Gaza Flotilla!-Posted on Israel National News-By Gavriel Queenann-On June 3, 2011:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/144733#replies

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Is Israel the next Arab Facebook Campaign?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/30/is-israel-the-next-arab-facebook-campaign/

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Hispanics Won’t Save Obama In 2012!

Posted on Forbes-By Merrill Matthews. RIGHT DIRECTIONS-On June 18, 2011:

“President Barack Obama is hoping his visit to Puerto Rico will shore up the Hispanic vote for Democrats, but more importantly for his 2012 re-election bid.

The media choir has been singing a similar tune, especially since the U.S. Census Bureau recently released a new report, “The Hispanic Population: 2010,” which documents the disproportionately large growth in the Hispanic population.

According to the 2010 Census, there were 308.7 million people residing in the U.S. on April 1, 2010, of which 50.5 million (16 percent) were of Hispanic or Latino origin.

In addition, the Bureau asserted, “More than half of the growth in the total population of the United States between 2000 and 2010 was due to the increase in the Hispanic population.”  Since Hispanics tend to vote Democratic—67 percent for Obama in 2008, according to a post-election poll cited in the New York Times—the Obama campaign thinks that growth could swing important states to the president.

That thinking is as wishful, and deluded, as the happy talk that surrounded the president’s economic policies and “shovel-ready” stimulus efforts that were going to get the country working again.  Here’s why.

People ≠ Voters That New York Times story pointed out that only 10 million Latinos voted in the 2008 election, 9 percent of all voters, and that was a record high.  Why so low?  For one thing, the Hispanic population is younger than the general population: 27.4 years was the median age for Hispanics in 2009, vs. 36.8 years for the U.S.  Younger ages are less likely to vote, and a disproportionately large percentage of Hispanics aren’t even of voting age.

Another important point: No one knows how many of those 50 million Hispanics are citizens eligible to vote.  The Census counts people in the U.S., not citizens.  Someone from the Bureau told me that interviewers do not ask about citizenship nor do they record citizenship status.  There has been a groundswell of Hispanics entering the U.S. over the last decade, some legally but many not, which has led to a huge national debate over immigration.  How many of the 15.2 million more Hispanics (between 2000 and 2010) are eligible to vote?  We simply don’t know from Census surveys, but it’s reasonable to think that many, and perhaps most, can’t—at least not legally.

The Electoral College Decides The Electoral College, not the popular vote, decides who will be president.  If none of those 50 million new Hispanics lived in California, President Obama would likely get all of the state’s 55 electoral votes; if all of them lived in California—and the largest number do—and they all vote for Obama he would still get … 55 electoral votes.

So the question for presidential election purposes is as much about where those votes are as how many there are.  The Census Bureau says 75 percent of the Hispanic population is located in eight states: California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, Arizona, New Jersey and Colorado.  Of those states, California, New York, Illinois and New Jersey will very likely remain blue in the next presidential election, while Texas and Arizona will almost certainly remain red.  Colorado, which has been trending blue, and Florida, which leans red but not by much, could be swayed.

Of the nine states where the Hispanic population more than doubled—Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and South Dakota—eight are in the south and all but one, Maryland, either lean or are strongly red.

The point is that a burgeoning Hispanic population may lead to a major shift in voting patterns at some point in the future, but not 2012.  That said, there are some important swing states—e.g., Florida, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Colorado—that could be affected by Hispanic votes next year.

Hispanics Are Diverse The Census Bureau struggles with identifying a “Hispanic” since it is not a race, but more a place of origin, such as Central or South America or countries located in the Caribbean.  Needless to say, there are lots of differences among these populations.  Puerto Ricans living on the mainland, for example, tend to vote Democratic; those of Cuban descent tend to vote Republican.  But the largest Puerto Rican population is in New York, which will vote for Obama anyway.  In swing-state Florida, however, Cubans outnumber Puerto Ricans by 400,000.

Hispanics Are More Affected by a Bad Economy — A lot has been made of the notion that the Hispanic population, many of whom are Catholic, tend to embrace conservative social values but liberal economic policies.  And those conservative social values give Republicans an opportunity to attract them to the GOP.

But the real opportunity for the GOP to get their presidential vote in 2012 comes from the devastating impact President Obama’s economic policies have had on lower-income families.  Texas, where I live, has the second largest Hispanic population; they come mostly from Mexico and Central America, according to the Census.  Most are hard workers who take service sector jobs in agriculture, construction, yard and landscape work, and restaurants.  When the economy goes south, they are some of the first and hardest hit.

Those who are citizens and can vote may decide that Obama has had his chance.  The recession officially ended in June of 2009, yet two years later the unemployment rate at 9.1 percent is still disastrously high—and much higher for Hispanics.  Even more troubling, the president seems befuddled about what to do next.

Of course, Obama may still get more Hispanic votes than his Republican challenger, but that doesn’t mean he wins; Sen. John Kerry won the Hispanic vote over President Bush in 2004 by 9 percentage points, and Bush still won.  But there is little reason to think, both for demographic reasons and the sour economy, that Hispanics will provide Obama with a victory in 2012.

However, the Census Bureau publication does point to a trend that neither party can ignore.  Hispanics are becoming a larger and more politically potent force in U.S. politics.  The party that moves to provide them with the greatest opportunities, not the most handouts, is the one that will capture their allegiance for the long term.

Source:

http://blogs.forbes.com/merrillmatthews/2011/06/15/hispanics-wont-save-obama-in-2012/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this issue-You Decide:

I. Obama’s Hispanic Vote Slipping Away!

Posted on Front Page Magazine-By Tait Trussell-On Jun 17, 2011:

“Buenas Tardes” (good afternoon). Barack Obama greeted a crowd of Puerto Ricans in Spanish in San Juan on a presidential visit intended to shore up support of roughly 4.6 million Puerto Ricans who live on the mainland. The Puerto Ricans on the island can’t vote for president even though they’re U.S. citizens.

The Obama campaign machine is striving desperately to recapture the Hispanic vote. In 2008, Obama won 67 percent of the Hispanic voters nationally. The president’s failure to enact an immigration law and vigorously crack down on undocumented workers, however, has caused his glamour to tarnish a bit. A Wall Street Journal/NBC poll in late March found that his Latino support had slid to 60 percent.

As of July 2009, 48.4 million people of Hispanic origin lived in the U.S. Today, it’s 50.5 million, the country’s largest ethnic or race minority.

During his welcoming ceremony in San Juan, Obama tried to scrape together Hispanic favor by saying that he would support whatever decision the Island makes about statehood—a long standing dispute over statehood or independence.

The recession has hit Puerto Rico like a small hurricane. The jobless rate is 17 percent, compared to the latest unemployment figure for the U.S. of 9.1 percent. Referring to unemployment, Obama, in a lame statement, said, “These problems didn’t develop overnight here in Puerto Rico or anywhere else, but that means we’re not going to solve them overnight. But day by day, step by step, we will solve them.”

Obama flew to Puerto Rico from campaign stops in North Carolina and Florida to play up to more Latinos. North Carolina has about 380,000 Hispanics. In Florida there are about 840,000 Puerto Ricans.

While the Democrats have the Hispanic vote for 2012 in their headlights, some disconcerting facts that are not well known should dampen their enthusiasm. Despite the overly rapid growth of Latinos, many are far too young to vote. More than a third of Latinos (34.9 percent) are now below the voting age of 18, according to the Pew Hispanic Center.

Hispanics comprise 22 percent of all U.S. children younger than 18. Some 43 percent of married couples who are Hispanic have children under age 18. Twenty percent of all elementary and high school students combined are Hispanic. They won’t be voting any time soon.

While 67 percent of eligible Hispanics voted for Obama in 2008, voter turnout of Latinos lags behind whites (48.6 percent), and 44 percent of eligible blacks. That compares to less than a third (31.2 percent ) of eligible Latino voters who said they voted. Only 42 percent of the Latino population — for one reason or another — is eligible to vote. Among Latinos who go to the polls, those age 18 to 28 had the lowest turnout—17.5 percent. Obama’s glory seems to be disappearing among youthful worshipers.

In 2010, the Hispanic electoral tidal wave dissipated. Latino voters, along with Asian voters, mainly avoided the 2010 election. A record 14.7 million Hispanic voters, in effect, sat on their hands for the 2010 race, according to the Pew Hispanic Center. The absence from the ballot boxes of so many Hispanic voters hurt many Democrats.

Fewer than 31 percent of eligible Hispanic and Asian voters went to the polls in the 2010 congressional elections, compared with 49 percent of eligible white voters and 44 percent of eligible black voters, the Pew report said.

The picture of minority voting comes in the wake of a poll showing the support for Obama among Latinos down by more than 25 percent from what it was at the start of his administration, should send shivers up Democratic spines—even of those who are spineless on many issues.

More signs that the Obama “spell” is fading: After winning 67% of the Latino vote in 2008, only 43 percent of Hispanics polled by Univision—the Spanish language TV network in the U.S.– at the end of last July said Obama has addressed their needs. Another 32 percent indicated they were uncertain, while 21 percent said they believe Obama has done a poor job.

A meeting of Republicans in South Florida aimed at extending the GOP’s outreach to Latino voters was co-chaired by former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush. The conference was organized by the new Hispanic Action Network. It is one of a number of Republican efforts to influence Latino voters before the 2012 election.

CNN reported in 2010 that 38 percent of Hispanic voters cast ballots for Republican candidates, compared to only 29 percent in 2008.

Significantly, Republican Susana Martinez was elected governor of New Mexico (46 percent Hispanic population), Brian Sandoval  became governor of Nevada (27 percent Hispanic population) and Marco Rubio won the U.S. Senate race in Florida (23 percent Hispanic).

Exit polls indicated that 38 percent of Latino voters voted for House Republican candidates in 2010. This “despite pre-election claims by advocates for illegal immigration that a pro-rule-of-law stand would alienate Hispanic voters,” wrote Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) June 2 in Politico. 

Five Hispanic Republicans were elected to the House.

“They focused on patriotism, rule of law, freedom, family, support for small business, jobs, and education,” Smith wrote.

Most of these are fundamental values from which President Obama has distanced himself.

Source:

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/06/17/obama’s-hispanic-vote-slipping-away/

II. 64,000 Cases of Possible Voter Fraud Being Investigated in New Mexico!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Susan Jones-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/64000-cases-possible-voter-fraud-being-i

III. Despite Congressional Leader's Claim, Requiring an ID to Vote is Nothing Like Forced Segregation!-Posted on The Center for Public Policy Research-On June 7, 2011:

http://www.nationalcenter.org/P21PR-VoterID_060711.html

IV. Time to Launch Operation Chaos!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Michael Oberndorf-On June 16, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/time-to-launch-operation-chaos-2-0-12/

V. ‘White House officials involved in rewriting nation’s founding document’!-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On March 27, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=280277

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this issue-You Decide:

Massive Voter Fraud-Again!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/massive-voter-fraud-again/

Court overturns Arizona’s proof of citizenship requirement for voter registration!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/27/court-overturns-arizona’s-proof-of-citizenship-requirement-for-voter-registration/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

My Sharpest Weapon: A Smile

I've learned to smile.  It is an acquired skill.  It is a gift.  Heavenly Father gave to me and I like to share, so you get some of it too.

I have spent a couple of days at the Right Online conference in beautiful downtown Minneapolis.  I have had a thoroughly happy time.  Why not?  I am an American.  I am still (mostly free).  I am surrounded by other Americans in a great American city.  I have a God who cares about me and my freedom.  I have 4 beautiful and amazing children in Colorado.  What's not to smile about.

Netroots, the liberal version of Right Online, a little older, more extreme Left than we are Right, cranky and negative, has been taking place across the street from our hotel.  Meetings in the streets, on elevators, in lobbies are inevitable between the "Nutroots" crowd and the "Vast Right Wing Conspirators."  I got on the elevator going down this morning and a very hip young lady got on at the same time.  She noticed my Right Online lanyard, I noticed her Netroots lanyard.  She was uncomfortable. I was exhilarated.  I had her trapped for 6 floors.  She began, "It looks like we're...opposites."  I was thoughtful, "Ummm," I said, "yeah, but we're both Americans.  That is the most important thing we share."  "And," she added, relaxing slightly, "we both use the internet!"  A pleasant conversation ensued.  She asked me what I blogged about and I told her my story.  When we got to the lobby I wished her a wonderful day.  She smiled a big smile my direction.  I walked up to the intersection and she promptly jay-walked across the street.

I have seen perhaps a hundred activists from Netroots on the streets around the convention centers here.  I smile and purposely make eye contact.  Some give me a glower, some an "hurrumph," and some, like the young lady in the elevator, have shared my smile.  I have 4 children who have passed through or are now residing in their young adulthood.  I have an instinctive love for young people.  And it occurred to me that I am not fighting against the individuals at Netroots, or on the Left.  I am fighting, as a Conservative, against bad ideas, bad policies, and bad institutions.  This is not a war of Americans against Americans.  It is a war of truth against lies, freedom against tyranny,  and civility against hatred.  I wielded the weapon of a smile, and I won a little piece of a young woman's heart.  And she won a little of mine.  This is where the most crucial battles will be fought.  It is more than a platitude to say "winning the hearts and minds of America."  It is a crucial strategy which should be the foundation of all rhetorical and political battles.

What better way to disarm the ideological foe, who is at their heart a friend waiting to  learn that they too love their liberty, than to give them a smile, a pleasant conversation, and a wish for a wonderful day.  We have nothing to fear in our own kindness.  And that young lady whom I met on the elevator will never honestly be able to say that all conservatives are crazy, or mean, or cranky, or old white men.

 

read more at http://reagangirl.com/?p=9528

 

Read more…
flag









By John W. Lillpop

As a point of reference, racist is formally defined as follows:

Racist - a person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others.

In the on-line dictionary from which that definition was derived, the word "white" was omitted before the word "person," no doubt the product of biased editing by a red-necked scalawag from the Old South still immersed in denial.

Keeping the formal definition above in mind, compare it to the applications used by politically correct progressives, ever watchful for wedge issues with which to divide the American people.

According to progressives, you are a racist if you:

*Are on record as believing that American culture, including contributions made by angry white Christian men, has produced the greatest and most successful society in human history;

*Get goose bumps and shivers up and down your spine when Old Glory is feted or when the Star Spangled Banner is performed;

*Believe that America is a sovereign nation and, as such, perfectly justified in securing our borders against invasion by illegal aliens and other criminals;

*Believe that the rule of law is a basic tenet of American democracy, and, as such, inviolable;

*Believe that federal spending and the $14 trillion dollar national debt are destroyng the nation and agree with Paul Ryan's Blueprint for Propserity;

*Support enforcement of the Immigration Reform Control Act of 1986;

*Are proud of the English language, and support making English the official language of commerce, law, education, and culture in America;

*Oppose affirmative action, bilingualism and other reverse discrimination outrages;

*Watch FOX News for more than three hours in any given calendar quarter;

*Believe that the federal government should prevent illegal aliens from taking over American streets to demand rights and benefits reserved for U.S. citizens;

*Believe that Uncle Sam has an obligation to round up and deport illegal aliens, particularly during time of war;

*Believe that legislation is urgently needed to prevent illegal aliens from using "anchor babies" to circumvent U.S. law;

*Adamantly oppose amnesty, defined as anything short of deportation;

*Regard "Sanctuary Cities" as serious violations of federal law that should cause city officials to be arrested and prosecutedl

*Believe that in-state tuition breaks, driver's licenses, and other progressive hand outs serve only to attract even more illegal aliens and should be unlawful;

*Oppose the use of taxpayer funds to print ballots, government information, and educational materials in languages other than English;

*Own two or more American flags and participate in tawdry displays of excessive Americanism on Flag Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, and other patriotic holidays;

* Have knowingly registered or, perish the thought, voted Republican within the past 50 years;

*Failed to vote for Barack Obama and/or are among those who disapprove of his incompetent, biased, dangerous presidency;

*Are Caucasian, or look suspiciously like a Caucasian.

Please note that this checklist does not apply to African-Americans, Hispanics, Asians, or Native Americans because people from those racial and ethnic backgrounds are genetically incapable of being racists!


Read more…

"ONE QUESTION" HAMMER and NAIL

June 19, 2011: Happy Fathers Day! 

 

When You’re Holding a Hammer (Everything Looks Like a Nail)

http://www.holdingahammer.com/

 

Questions about Obama’s citizenship status from before the election in 2008 have come full circle, you might say the most Holy Reverend Jeremiah Wright, was right, chickens do come home to roost. Obama is not a “Natural Born Citizen”, and his alliance by birth is to two countries. Obama’s release of his Long Form Birth Certificate April 27, 2011, is a prima facie admission that the two alleged disqualifiers for the Presidency, is now confirmed as fact.

 

NOTE: This call to action is not a question of Obama’s qualification (at this step), rather it is a question of Congresses Constitutional understanding of the requirements to run for the President of the United States of America, and their (Congressmen’s) oath to uphold that Constitution, as being questioned by their employer, We the People aka the HAMMER.

 

As Obama has now confirmed he was not qualified to run for president pursuant to The Constitution of the United States of America. All current members of Congress, Republicans, Democrats and other’s, aka NAIL(S) totaling 100 in the Senate and 435 in the House, have by their silence, confirmed they are either an ACCESSORY BEFORE and/or AFTER THE FACT.

 

Prior such violations of our Constitution if any, does not set precedence as one crime or intent (action taken or not) cannot be used to validate another like crime or intent.  The old adage applies: two wrongs don’t make a right. Better check Mitt Romney’s “Natural Born Citizen” status while we are at it.  

 

To determine who has and/or is continuing to PERVERT the Constitution, it is VERY IMPORTANT that we provide the 112th Congress 1st Session, the opportunity this coming July 2011 when they are back in Session, to consider the “ONE QUESTION” being asked by WE THE PEOPLE.

 

That “ONE QUESTION” being asked of EACH AND EVERY CONGRESSMAN, by EACH AND EVERY RESPECTIVE CONSTITUENT is: Congressman ....(name).... DEFINE by August 1, 2011 what “Natural Born Citizen” means in respect to one being qualified to seek and hold the office of the President of the United States of America according to our Constitution? Please give MY (our) “ONE QUESTION” the attention it deserves in the time frame requested. Sign your name and address.

 

You are asking THE question, only one question, stick to the question, no redirect and no deflection, tell them to just answer the damn question!

 

Start asking your representative when you read this, FAX, EMAIL and PHONE any and all of their District and DC offices. Send POST CARDS by USPS to their district office (they arrive sooner) as piles are impressive. Heck for the price, two or three post cards can be sent. Print post cards up and hand them out for a signatures so all they have to do is sign it and drop it in the mail, and by all means plaster the “ONE QUESTION” everywhere possible.

 

Here is the hard part: put Congresses appearance of complicity aside until after August 1, 2011, until after we have a chance to review their (House, Senate or both) response(s) to our ONE QUESTION, until after they commite one way or the other. Let it go until after August 1, 2011, DON’T ENGAGE IN DEBATE wait until August 1, 2011 – it will drive them nuts. Let it boil within you but only ask “THE” ONE QUESTION a hundred times until August 1, 2011. Give our elected Representatives aka NAILS, our employees a opportunity to respond to their boss WE THE PEOPLE, aka HAMMER.4063329968?profile=original

 

After August 1, 2001 depending on their response(s) – use your judgment on what to do.

 

In the mean time as we prepare to celebrate Independence Day, lets also prepare for the day after, Tuesday July 5, 2011, which marks the sixth month anniversary of the swearing in of the 112th Congress. Abraham Lincoln said it best, “We the People are the rightful master of both congress and the courts – not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”

 

In most states, there is a waiting period of six months after swearing in of the U.S. Congress before recall petitions can be initiated. On July 5 we can send an indirect direct message, start recalls on them all, each and everyone as we don’t know how they are going to answer our “ONE QUESTION.” Why walk around with one petition, when you can walk around with a fist full of them? Check your local laws and get started July 5, 2011. As for States that do not allow recall of their Senators, start a recall on them anyway, as well as initiate petitions to change any said laws prohibiting the recall of those not representing or responding to our best interest.

 

HOPE and CHANGE, how about MAKE CHANGE HAPPEN because, WHEN YOU’RE HOLDING A HAMMER, EVERYTHING LOOKS LIKE A NAIL! Ain’t that right Howard Dean YYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!

 

Just who is allowing this to continue, the U.S. Senate, the House - both, or the courts slow response before the election, after the election, or both? Or WE THE PEOPLE the boss; are we allowing this tyranny to be played against us?

 

IF I HAD A HAMMER (The Hammer Song)

words and music by Lee Hays and Pete Seeger

(last chorus)

Well I've got a hammer

And I've got a bell

And I've got a song to sing

All over this land

It's the hammer of justice

It's the bell of freedom

It's the song about love between my brothers and my sisters

All over this land

 

WOW, If I had a hammer, never thought a song written to support the progressive movement would symbolize the struggle to save America from the clutches of those same progressives.

 

Than again I kind of like

 

When You’re Holding a Hammer (Everything Looks Like a Nail!)

Words and Music by Kyle Hill and Bryan Glover

(last chorus)

There’ll be a party come this November

Where we’re gonna set things straight

All good people gonna gather ‘round

Gonna show what made this country great

We’ll run off the schemers and back-room dealers

So the Red, White and Blue will prevail

When we’re holding the hammer

When we’re holding the hammer

When we’re holding the hammer

Every one of them looks like a nail

 

"ONE QUESTION" HAMMER and NAIL on PatriotHQ

"ONE QUESTION" HAMMER and NAIL on GPTPP

 

Read more…

Posted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover-On June 16, 2011:

(CNSNews.com) – In a 30-page report justifying continued military involvement in the NATO-led strikes in Libya, the Obama administration claims that U.S. military involvement is “legitimated” by the UN Security Council – saying that therefore no congressional authorization is needed.

“U.S. forces are playing a constrained and supporting role in a multinational coalition, whose operations are both legitimated by and limited to the terms of a United Nations Security Council Resolution that authorizes the use of force solely to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under attack or threat of attack and to enforce a no-fly zone and an arms embargo,” the report said.

Obama also claimed that the U.S. military’s involvement falls under his constitutional authority as commander in chief and his power to conduct foreign relations.

“Given the important U.S. interests served by U.S. military operations in Libya and the limited nature, scope and duration of the anticipated actions, the President had constitutional authority, as Commander in Chief and Chief Executive and pursuant to his foreign affairs powers, to direct such limited military operations abroad,” the report said.

Thirdly, the administration claims that its actions are not governed by the War Powers Act because the U.S. involvement does not constitute “hostilities” – the term used by the act to limit the time the president may commit U.S. forces into combat.

The War Powers Act limits the president to a unilateral military commitment of no more than 60 days before he must request congressional authorization.

However, Obama claims that he needs no such authorization.

“The President is of the view that the current U.S. military operations in Libya are consistent with the War Powers Resolution and do not under that law require further congressional authorization, because U.S. military operations are distinct from the kind of “hostilities” contemplated by the Resolution’s 60 day termination provision.”

While the report misleadingly uses the term “further authorization,” the fact is that Congress never granted it authorization in the first place. Instead, Obama has issued a series of letters to congressional leadership explaining his actions and has dispatched various aides and surrogates to brief Congress on the mission in Libya.”

Source:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-us-actions-libya-legitimated-un

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Video: Liberal Congressman, Obama is “An Absolute Monarch”!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On June 24, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/06/24/video-liberal-congressman-obama-is-an-absolute-monarch/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=d9ed8c26f9-EO_06_24_2011_Aft6_24_2011&utm_medium=email

II. U.S. Paying to Keep Libyan Anti-Aircraft Missiles Away From Terror Groups!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By STEPHEN BRAUN, Associated Press-On June 17, 2011:

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/us-funds-hunt-libyan-missiles

III. Obama's unauthorized war on Libya costs $9,421,000 a day: Are you getting your money's worth?-Posted on The LA Times-By Andrew Malcolm-On June 16, 2011:

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2011/06/obama-libya-war-congress-authority-war-powers.html

IV. Pelosi: Obama Doesn't Need Congressional Authorization for Libya Action!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Nicholas Ballasy-On June 16, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/pelosi-obama-did-not-and-does-not-need-c

V. The Way Forward in Libya!-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By by James Phillips, James Jay Carafano, Ph.D. and Morgan Roach-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2011/06/US-Role-in-Libya-and-the-Way-Forward

VI. NATO sliding towards Libyan ground war: Russian envoy!-Posted on Yahoo News-By Adrian Croft, Reuters –On Jun 15, 2011:

http://beta.news.yahoo.com/nato-sliding-towards-libyan-ground-war-russian-envoy-193632749.html

VII. A Showdown over the War in Libya!-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On June 15, 2011:

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/06/15/morning-bell-a-showdown-over-the-war-in-libya/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell

VIII. Will John Boehner and Congress Finally Take a Stand for the Constitution?-Posted on The Patriot Update-On June 15, 2011:

http://patriotupdate.com/8191/will-john-boehner-and-congress-finally-take-a-stand-for-the-constitution

IX. Video: “Nothing Could Be More Impeachable” Than Obama’s Libyan War!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On June 16, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/06/16/video-nothing-could-be-more-impeachable-than-obamas-libyan-war/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=c179baf9e2-EO_06_16_20116_16_2011&utm_medium=email

X.  George Soros assault on U.S. Constitution: ‘White House officials involved in rewriting nation’s founding document’!-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On March 27, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=280277

Note:  My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Harlequin Novel, 2011 Version

Dear Friends,

I was sure my computer was going to crash any second, but surely it would smoke no later than reaching the end of this brilliantly titillating piece. Thoughts of somehow having intercepted the latest of the “Weiner” tapes went through my mind, or possibly the LasVegas pressure cooker. Well, I’ll refrain from saying more – but you must promise me you’ll go all the way, to the end that is! And I promise that you will not regret it, when you get there, and we will still be Friends! I wish I could take credit, instead it merely goes to show you that I have good Friends who are also nuts. I like it that way.

Semper Fi

(Note: don't skip the lines as you progress)

 

_____________________________________________________________________

 

 

He grasped me firmly, but gently, just above my elbow and

guided me into a room, his room.  Then he quietly shut the

door and we were alone.  He approached me soundlessly, from

behind, and spoke in a low, reassuring voice close to my

ear.

  

 

  

"Just relax."

  

 

 

  

Without warning, he reached down and I felt his strong,

calloused hands start at my ankles, gently probing, and

moving upward along my calves, slowly but steadily. My

breath caught in my throat.

  

  

  

I knew I should be afraid, but somehow I didn't care.  His

touch was so experienced, so sure.  When his hands moved up

onto my thighs, I gave a slight shudder, and partly closed

my eyes.  My pulse was pounding.

  

 

  

I felt his knowing fingers caress my abdomen, my  ribcage.

And then, as he cupped my firm, full breasts in his hands, I

inhaled sharply.

  

 

  

Probing, searching,

knowing what he wanted, he brought his hands to my shoulders,

slid them down my tingling spine and into my panties.

  

 

  

Although I knew nothing about this man, I felt oddly

trusting and expectant. This is a man, I thought.  A man

used to taking charge.  A man not used to taking 'No' for an

answer.  A man who would tell me what he wanted. 

A man who would look into my soul and say . . .

 

(keep going)  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"Okay ma'am, you can board your flight now."

Maybe we shouldn’t complain – this might after all be the last thrill grandma can ever hope to get.

___________________________________________________________________

 

Now that you have taken your cold showers and returned from never land, here is my take on this ingenious little piece of ecstasy - the fact is that these groping sessions are exacted upon us, the American citizen, a free people, from infant to senior Viagra, and all because we have been misled into believing that dealing with a terrorist by looking for the Fox in the chicken coop is somehow compromising our freedom - what freedom? The freedom we are protecting!?
 

I am publishing this piece without fear of retribution, for it is as powerful a statement as one can make in exposing the hypocrisy that rules the day - dictated behavior in a free society, void of all common sense, and ordered by the State!

There is nothing wrong with either the language nor the substance of this satire. It is a clean and straight forward statement of factual behavior when ruled by legalisms and the State, and a perfect example of Common Sense, or the lack thereof (you are fortunate to have it and smart to know when you don’t - and the State has neither), but it wants to teach our fourth graders about sex (I am sure you remember how that worked out when the State started teaching your kids about their rights - my two beautiful boys turned into little jerks, before we managed to return them back to normal) - I’d say this passes the test.

Read more…

Posted on National Review Online- By Stanley Kurtz-On June 17, 2011:

Jonah rightly calls today’s David Brooks column a must-read. Brooks discusses Reckless Endangerment, the new book by Gretchen Morgenson and Joshua Rosner exposing Fannie Mae’s role in the runup to the financial crisis. Brooks also rightly credits Michele Bachmann for her important role in publicizing a topic many other national politicians have been silent on.

I’ve only had a chance to give Reckless Endangerment a quick look, but my impression is that it tells the right story, if a bit too much from Fannie Mae’s point of view. In Morgenson and Rosner’s telling, Fannie Mae effectively buys off ACORN and other low-income housing groups. There’s some truth to that, but it underestimates the extent to which ACORN and allied groups forced Fannie Mae into the subprime business in the first place, and sometimes pushed themselves onto Fannie Mae against resistance.

I tell that story in the ACORN chapter of Radical-in-Chief, based on heretofore unseen documents from the ACORN archive at the Wisconsin Historical Society.

I also show that Barack Obama was knee-deep in ACORN activities just as their banking campaign reached its height. In fact, much of ACORN’s national housing campaign in the mid-nineties was coordinated from the Chicago office Obama was funneling money to at the time.

So if the combination of the publication of Reckless Endangerment and Michele Bachmann’s campaign brings a new awareness of Fannie Mae’s role in precipitating the financial crisis, by rights it also ought to raise awareness of ACORN’s role, and Obama’s abetment of ACORN activism as well. Of course, for that very reason, the entire story is likely to be ignored. Maybe only someone like Bachmann has the power to break it through.”

Source:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/269895/fannie-acorn-obama-and-financial-crisis-stanley-kurtz

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Fannie Mae scandal is the most important political scandal since Watergate!-Posted on The New York Times-By DAVID BROOKS-On June 16, 2011:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/17/opinion/17brooks.html?_r=1

II. Video: Obama’s Failed Secular, Socialist Ideas are Destroying the USA!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On June 19, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/06/19/video-obamas-failed-secular-socialist-ideas-are-destroying-the-usa/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=4a78c9e4a1-EO_06_19_20116_19_2011&utm_medium=email

III. Alan Simpson, Erskine Bowles Predict Coming Economic Crisis!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Forrest Jones-On June 18, 2011:

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/Economy-AlanSimpson-ErskineBowles/2011/06/18/id/400503?s=al&promo_code=C76C-1

IV. IMF: Washington is ‘Playing With Fire’ on Deficit!-Posted on Money News-By Thomson, Reuters-On June 17, 2011:

http://www.moneynews.com/StreetTalk/imf-debt-globaleconomy/2011/06/17/id/400410?s=al&promo_code=C76E-1

V. Swindling America’s Youth!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Writer-On June 15, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/swindling-americas-youth/

VI. The Ignorance of Barack Obama!-Posted on RushLimbaugh.com-By Rush Limbaugh-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_061511/content/01125110.guest.html

VII. ‘Too Big to Fail’ May Still Exist Despite Democrats’ Regulations!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/too-big-fail-may-still-exist-despite-dem

VIII. Stimulus destroys more jobs than it creates!-Posted on The Locker Room-On June 14, 2011:

http://lockerroom.johnlocke.org/2011/06/14/stimulus-destroys-more-jobs-than-it-creates-there-was-no-other-possiblity/

IX. Obama's Co-Chair Concurs: We Face Most Predictble Economic Crisis in History In About 2 Years!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Ryan-On June 14, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/former-sen-simpson-tipping-point-will-co

X. Obama Blames ATMs for High Unemployment!-Posted on Conservative Byte-On June 14, 2011:

http://conservativebyte.com/2011/06/obama-blames-atms-for-high-unemployment/

XI. 18 Signs The Collapse Of Society Is Accelerating!-Posted on The Economic Collapse-On June 2011:

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/18-signs-the-collapse-of-society-is-accelerating

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

ACORN-The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)-Automaker Labor Unions!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/acorn-the-community-reinvestment-act-cra-automaker-labor-unions/

What Was The Chicago Annenberg Challenge?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/22/what_was_the_chicago_annenberg_challenge.thtml

Was the Economic Crisis Manufactured?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/was-the-economic-crisis-manufactured/

Who or What Was Behind the Financial Crisis?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/06/who’s-behind-the-financial-crisis/

Treasury Secretary hired firm to help cover-up stimulus records!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/06/treasury-secretary-hired-firm-to-help-cover-up-stimulus-records/

Is the Fed’s concept of buying $600 billion of Treasuries just a smokescreen?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/is-the-fed’s-concept-of-buying-600-billion-of-treasuries-just-a-smokescreen/

The Obama Fiscal Responsibility Farce Continues!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/the-obama-fiscal-responsibility-farce-continues/

The Wall Street Bailout Bill Threatens Our Bottom Line!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/the-wall-street-bailout-bill-threatens-our-bottom-line/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by the Obama administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Left & Right With Andrew Breitbart!

What follows is a must see five video series that contain an eye-opening interview conducted by Peter Robinson with Andrew Breitbart, a publisher, columnist, and blogger, who is the founder ofBreitbart.comBreitbart.tvBig GovernmentBig HollywoodBig Journalism, and Big Peace. He is also the author of his latest book titled “Righteous Indignation”-You Decide:

Left & Right with Andrew Breitbart: ‘Andrew Breitbart describes his liberal origins’. (Chapter 1 of 5)-Posted on National Review Online-On June 13, 2011:

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=MDBjZjcxOWI2ZDQ1MzVhMjc0Y2FhYWFlODNmNDhlYWI=

Left & Right with Andrew Breitbart: ‘Andrew Breitbart illustrates the Democrat-Media Complex.’ (Chapter 2 of 5)-Posted on National Review Online-On June 14, 2011:

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=YWQ5NGY1MzY4NzA4MjJmNTkwNmZmNDk3N2Y4N2I3YjE=

Left & Right with Andrew Breitbart: ‘Andrew Breitbart accepts some blame for the Huffington Post.’ (Chapter 3 of 5)-Posted on National Review Online-On June 15, 2011:

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=MjZmN2U0ZGIzMjc2NGU1MmQwYjQ0YTJlZTdkNDA4YzM=

Left & Right with Andrew Breitbart: ‘Andrew Breitbart reveals his one “Ah ha!” moment.’ (Chapter 4 of 5)-Posted on National Review Online-On June 16, 2011:

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=NjlhZGJiYzVhM2U1OWRmYjM5NjJkMTUyNTE1ZDBlY2Y=

Left & Right with Andrew Breitbart: ‘Andrew Breitbart lists his rules.’ (Chapter 5 of 5)-Posted on National Review Online-On June 17, 2011:

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=ODE4OGZmNWMzYzk3NWJjZmMyNjU0M2U3OTk2YzYyYzc=

Also included is a book review of Andrew Breitbart’s new book that reveals the history of Socialism in America, beginning with early worship of Jean-Jacques Rousseau (who actually came before Karl Marx) to the scary Frankfurt School at Columbia University and that Marxism started in universities, government and the media, which he claims is America’s worst enemy, along with 13 Rules for Conservative Activists and much more:

Book Review: Andrew Breitbart’s Righteous Indignation!-Posted on The Patriot Update-By Ann-Marie Murrell-On May 23, 2011:

http://patriotupdate.com/articles/book-review-andrew-breitbart’s-righteous-indignation

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/21/who-owns-our-supposedly-fair-and-balanced-airwaves-and-news-outlets/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed since 2009 by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Posted on The Daily Caller-By Jonathan Strong-Updated on June 16, 2011:

Faced with bracing evidence and the testimony of four ATF agents contradicting the Justice Department’s initial blanket denials that assault weapons were knowingly allowed to escape into the clutches of Mexican drug cartels, Democrats tried a new approach at a hearing Wednesday.

Rather than focus on questioning the GOP’s investigative tactics, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee sought to subtly channel the burgeoning scandal into a push for new gun control laws.

For instance, Rep. Gerry Connolly, Virginia Democrat, connected the apparently reckless investigative strategy to the National Rifle Association’s (NRA) lobbying pushes.

“The NRA has opposed regulations which would require tracking of multiple gun sales,” Connolly noted in a statement passed out to reporters. “The gun lobby and its advocates in Congress are even trying to pass legislation to eviscerate the ATF’s authority to stop criminals.”

Rep. Carolyn Maloney, New York Democrat, also drew a link between the Operation Fast and Furious scandal and whether ATF agents are plagued by “toothless” laws.

“US Attorneys have complained” that prosecutions for illegally purchasing weapons to resell to criminal networks are viewed by judges as “mere paper violations. Have you heard this criticism before?” Maloney asked the four ATF agents testifying.

(CONTRADICTION: Four ATF agents contradict Justice Department account on ‘Fast and Furious’)

“I have and I agree with it,” said Peter Forceilli, who thought a minimum sentence of one year in jail would ensure cooperation from “straw buyers” caught by federal authorities.

Darrell Issa, chairman of the Oversight Committee, sought to intervene.

“I want to caution the witnesses,” Issa said. “The scope of your testimony here is limited, and is not about proposed legislation and the like.”

Elijah Cummings, Maryland Democrat and Issa’s combative foil on the oversight panel, protested vociferously. “It’s only fair” for the ATF agents to speak their mind about whether gun laws should be strengthened, he said.

The shift in tactics by the Democrats came as they also appeared to concede the weight of the evidence Issa was presenting clearly undercut blanket denials initially issued by the Justice Department.

Cummings, for instance, called the four ATF agents “great Americans” for “standing up for what you believe in,” and warned the ATF not to retaliate against the agents.

(RECONSIDER: ‘Wire’ co-creator to Holder: Reconsider drug war)

However, when a top deputy to Attorney General Eric Holder was testifying, Cummings ostentatiously apologized for Issa’s conduct in demanding answers from assistant attorney general Ronald Weich. “Let me apologize,” he said. Issa objected that “you may apologize on behalf of something you say.”

Cummings, in defending Weich, shows Democrats are still invested in defending the Obama administration even as documents and testimony are increasingly undermining the administration’s claims.

But the gun control comments Wednesday indicate they may be preparing to chart a new course: embracing the controversy and using it for their own political purposes.

That would, at the very least, leave less time to save Holder from Issa’s zealous investigation.”

Source:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/15/democrats-try-to-channel-scandal-into-gun-control-push/#ixzz1PTojDdvU

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Plan to Let Drug Cartels Buy Guns in U.S. Approved at ‘Highest Levels' of DOJ!

Posted on CNSNews.com-By Fred Lucas-On June 17, 2011:

(CNSNews.com) - Instead of trying to stop the flow of weapons from the U.S. to Mexican drug cartels, the Obama administration’s “Operation Fast and Furious” deliberately allowed it to happen. Moreover, “This shift in strategy was known and authorized at the highest levels of the Justice Department,” says a report by congressional staffers.

“Through both the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Arizona and ‘Main Justice’ headquarters in Washington, D.C., the Department closely monitored and supervised the activities of the ATF,” the report says.

On Wednesday, Rep. Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, convened a hearing to determine who ultimately authorized the Operation Fast and Furious, who knew about it – “and why it took the murder of a 40-year old border patrol agent and a congressional inquiry before administration officials cancelled it.”

Operation Fast and Furious, conducted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, was launched in 2009 in an effort to track the flow of guns from U.S. straw purchasers to Mexican cartels.

ATF agents who complained about the recklessness of allowing cartel associates to buy guns in Arizona were reprimanded, the congressional report said.

David Voth, a supervisor at the ATF field division in Phoenix, told complaining agents to back off: “Whether you care or not people of rank and authority at HQ are paying close attention to this case and they also believe we (Phoenix field division) are doing what they envisioned the Southwest Border Groups doing,” Voth wrote in an e-mail dated March 12, 2010. “It may sound cheesy, but we are ‘The Tip of the ATF spear’ when it comes to Southwest Border Firearms Trafficking.

“If you don’t think this is fun you’re in the wrong line of work – period,” the Voth e-mail continued: “This is the pinnacle of U.S. law enforcement techniques. After this, the tool box is empty. Maybe the Maricopa County Jail is hiring detention officers and you can get paid $30,000 (instead of $100,000) to serve lunch to inmates all day.”

Voth’s e-mail was included in a 51-page report by Republican staffers on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Two of the guns purchased by cartel associates were found at the scene of a U.S. Border Patrol agent’s murder in December.

Attorney General Eric Holder said in March he ordered the Justice Department inspector general to investigate the ATF’s gun-tracking operation – “to see exactly what happened, and whether or not what happened was appropriate.”

Source:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/atf-gun-tracking-probe-approved-highest

II. Assistant AG: ‘I Do Not Know’ Who Authorized Plan to Let Drug Cartels Get Guns!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Edwin Mora-On June 17, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/assistant-attorney-general-i-do-not-know

III. ATF Director Could Watch Live Video of Cartel Gun Buys--While Permitting Them to Proceed!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Edwin Mora-On June 17, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/top-atf-official-very-much-weeds-gun-run

IV. Gov't's Gun Scheme: ‘Loads of Weapons … for Criminals Was The Plan’!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Susan Jones and Terence P. Jeffrey-On June 16, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/dodson-video

V. ATF Agent to Bosses on Gun-Running Scheme: ‘Prepared to Attend Funeral of a Slain Agent’?-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Edwin Mora-On June 16, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/atf-agent-bosses-govt-gun-running-scheme

VI. Issa: ATF Mexican Gun Scandal a Lot Like Iran-Contra!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By David A. Patten-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/DarrellIssa-CharlesGrassley-ProjectGunrunner-OperationFastandFurious/2011/06/15/id/400174?s=al&promo_code=C719-1

VII. Four ATF Agents Contradict Justice Department Account on “Fast and Furious”?-Posted on ExposeObama.com-By Jonathan Strong, The Daily Caller-On June 15, 2011:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/15/four-atf-agents-contradict-justice-department-account-on-fast-and-furious/

VIII.  Video: Issa, Project Gunrunner was a Deadly Mistake!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On June 15, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/06/15/video-darrell-issa-project-gunrunner-was-a-deadly-mistake/?utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=48ec7d4e1b-EO_06_15_20116_15_2011&utm_medium=email

IX. Video: ATF Agent to Bosses on Gun-Running Scheme: ‘Prepared to Attend Funeral of a Slain Agent’?-Posted on CNSNews.com:

http://www.cnsnews.com/cnsnewstv/v/95922

X. DOJ Potentially Charged with Obstruction of Justice!-Posted on Patriot Update-By Ann-Marie Murrell-On June 8, 2011:

http://patriotupdate.com/articles/while-weiner-wept-doj-charged-with-obstruction-of-justice

XI. Back Door Gun Control and Fighting Back!-Posted on Human Events-By  Mike Piccione-On June 14, 2011:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=44108

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Did ATF provide weapons to Mexican drug cartels that were subsequently used to kill one of our own?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/did-atf-provide-weapons-to...

What is the true intent of the UN Small Arms Treaty?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/what-is-the-true-intent-of...

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed since 2009 by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…