arizona (25)

ADMIN

obama-scandals.jpg

The White House chief of staff said Sunday that President Obama is “madder than hell” about reports that dozens of veterans died due to preventable delays at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Appearing on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” Denis McDonough said the president is demanding that Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki and others in the administration “continue to fix these things until they’re functioning the way that our veterans believe they should.”

POLL:Should Barack Obama resign the Presidency? 

“The president is madder than hell. I’ve got the scars to prove it,” he added.

The VA is investigating scheduling practices at its hospitals as part of a nationwide audit after rumors surfaced that a secret electronic wait list showed information from veterans that was entered into computers at a Phoenix VA facility but never saved. Dozens of veterans reportedly died while waiting on the fake lists.

The department’s secretary, Eric Shinseki, resigned on Friday, just one day after lawmakers called for more accountability.



Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/may/18/obama-madder-hell-over-va-scandal-aide-says/#ixzz326Go7xpx 

Read more…

Action plan for the 2014 Elections

I've commented before about the need for us to get on top of the 2014 elections immediately; there are many Congressional districts where good conservatives either have a fighting chance or where a conservative challenger needs to be identified and supported in next year's GOP primaries.  The first step in that process is to assess the 2012 election results and the resulting representation district by district in every state.

In the image below I've done that for my home state of Arizona, which has 9 Congressional districts.  (My apologies if it's hard to read; I'm far from expert at this sort of online thing!)

In the 2012 elections, two formerly Republican districts (1 and 9) ended up with a Democrat representative because the Republican candidate lost votes to a Libertarian 3rd party candidate.  In both cases, the losing Republican appeared to be a fairly strong conservative.  Why, aside from arrogance, ideological perfectionism, or deliberate sabotage, did there need to be a Libertarian candidate in these races?  The GOP committeemen covering this district need to be working with local Libertarian party leaders to gain their backing for good candidates.  Surely Tea Party members in those districts have a role to play here.

In two other races, the losing Republican was a solid conservative who lost by a very slim margin.  With just a little more energetic door-to-door support, these candidates might have won their races.  These districts need to be high priorities for the Arizona Tea Party; we need to work with the local committeemen to get more legs and faces out on the streets to better support these candidates.

Finally in district 4, we have a Republican who won in a huge landslide, but who has a rather poor voting record as a conservative.  This--a strongly Republican district with a moderate incumbent--is a good opportunity for a Tea Party challenge in the next primary.

With some hard work, good candidates, and a little luck, it's conceivable Arizona's House contingent could be turned from a humiliating 5 to 4 Democrat majority to a 7 to 2 Republican majority--and conservatives to boot.  That may be too good to imagine, but anything is better than what we're stuck with now.  We need to take victories where we can get them, and keep trying where at first we don't succeed.

I'm in district 5; my representative is a good conservative.  I'll do what I can to help in those other districts where opportunities exist.  I encourage my fellow Tea Partiers to take similar initiative in their own states, identifying districts where opportunities exist and taking action on those opportunities.

 

4063668155?profile=original

Read more…

Please Indulge me for a second and read ALL that follows and respond!!

KEY ACTION... RESPOND!!!

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation".

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--

Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.

The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

 

 

Updated Facts Submitted to a Candid Country

My reading of the preamble of the "Declaration Of Independence" according to DHS profiles me as a potential domestic terrorist.

  • "Extreme Right-Wing groups that believe that one’s personal and/or national “way of life” is under attack and is either already lost or that the threat is imminent (for some the threat is from a specific ethnic, racial, or religious group), and believe in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism. Groups may also be fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation), anti-global, suspicious of centralized federal authority, reverent of individual liberty, and believe in conspiracy theories that involve grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty.

I thought this was the essence of being an American... To QUESTION authority and have that authority under the control of citizens who empower them to enforce our laws. Need we be reminded that alphabet agencies and peace officers do not insure our freedom and/or safety...  Our bill of rights does this by constraining these groups. Please imagine all these agencies without the constraint of the governed... We are now completely upside down as those in power have all but completely usurped power not granted. Need proof... Consider the following...

 

  • October 1, 2012: Incandescent light bulbs will be illegal in America... We will now be FORCED to use a product that we do not want or like and requires a HAZMAT procedure when broken...
  • Boeing was halted (by the National Labor Relations Board) from opening a major manufacturing plant in South Carolina.
  • November 2009: Gibson Guitar (Owner a Conservative) was raided with federal marshals that were armed over "Illegal Wood".
  • A move to ban 32oz drinks in New York
  • Salt banned in NY city restaurants
  • Tag Banned in CA
  • Foie gras ban in California
  • A little fish was put on the endangered species list and now the water supply to two thirds of California crop lands is shut off...
  • Smoking banned in YOUR OWN HOUSE in parts of CA.
  • Free Speech?? Well... If you are willing to be violated by the IRS, ATF, EPA, FDA, DEA, and the rest of the alphabet SURE go ahead..
  • Insurance or go to debtor prisons
  • Military service makes you a potential Domestic Terrorist... as does patriotism, being Pro Life, Devout Christianity,  pro second amendment.... Or anything else that would cause the left or Washington any accountability to our founding principals...
  • Firearms to be controlled by the UN and the second amendment eradicated!!! In America?? Now This Isn't Russia!!
  • Dairy farmers accounts seized over improper depositing of cash??
  • EPA stops Oil production we pay our enemies in US greenbacks that buy munitions to kill our solders and fund political movements to destroy our liberty and way of life.
  • England and Israel spat on while the Saudi Kings ASS GETS KISSED..
  • The attorney General "Eric Holder" Basically flips the bird to the American people and to congress over "Fast and Furious".
  • Oh and Let us not forget the FEMA camps being built at a rampant rate across the nation!! and the fact that we have the largest prison population in the world.
  • The American school system used to inculcate youth towards Irresponsibility and socialism.
  • Our borders left porous to justify appropriations that slowly illuminate the Bill Of Rights while the flow of slave labor allowed for votes.
  • The FEDS weep for illegal immigrants that are raped, sold into slavery, used for child prostitution and left for dead in the desert will not close the border to stop it...
  • A drug war that does more to create foreign cartels and U.S. prison colonies than protect the Liberties or safety of the American people.
  • A man who has ascended to the office of President who could not even get a  birth certificate that does not cause so many concerns.
  • The perpetual violation of the 1st, 2dn, 4th, 8th, 9th, 10th 14th sec1,   and the sprite in which all these amendments to the constitution were established.

 

It would seem very evident that America is currently under a full scale attack. Our Founding Fathers would be horrified by what the American people have allowed to transpire over the last 235 years. It is my profound belief that we are at a very critical point in world history. We are about to determine weather America will become a failed project of liberty and responsibility or will WE restore it to that great nation which the world so often envied.

 

Lets discuss a Prudent Course of Action        

We could continue with the exponential growing list of constitutional violations. But I do not think we have the time left in America to do so. The clock of non violent action is ticking to fast for us to just complain and re-iterate the obvious abuses. We must seek diligently a course of action that would restore us to the governed that "all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness".

 

We are under a full scale attack in America and we do not know what is an appropriate response... 

I do have an idea that may help...

How about we start at the state level and DEMAND that our state legislature, Local Peace Officers and the Sheriff's of every county REJECT the watershed of UNCONSTITUTIONAL mandates coming out of Washington DC. Furthermore let us REVOKE authorization from the DEA, ATF, EPA, FDA and the rest of the alphabet agency's who in like zombie like fashion arrest and incarcerate citizens over unconstitutional laws overtly violating the bill of rights.  We should withhold funding that facilitates these atrocities

 

As was the case with our founders, We here do not seek any violent resolutions... Contrarily it would seem that the only ones who seek violent resolutions to our complaints are the left and those in power.

 

Violence by the left

  • as evidenced by simple news reports of their Occupy  protests and gatherings that leave Filth, Property Damage, Raping of their own people and Injuries to Peace Officers.
  • G8 Summits
  • Bomber Bill Ayers who killed a San Francisco police officer

Violence by the government as evidenced by the following list...

  • FEMA in New Orleans
  • ATF in Ruby Ridge and border patrol killings, Waco MURDERS, and countless unnamed victims of  citizens turned into criminals by 242 pages of  regulations that are written so interpolation is in the eye of the ATF beholder. The use of power is to primarily disarm the American people through JACK BOOT intimidation and/or incarceration of FFL's and confiscatory policies over procedural violations

In my understanding the founders considered the disarming of the American people an act of aggression.

  • DHS (PATRIOT ACT) Oh Lord where do I even begin...
  • DEA Provides an appropriations vehicle to militarization law enforcement and build sprawling prisons factories of destroyed lives.
  • EPA This innocuous entity has done more to destroy wealth in America and facilitate the killing of American solders than has any other entity. Their prohibition on oil production and impeding any hydro electric development is insane! They continually regulate small and large businesses into extinction in the manner of  a cult or Nazi like fashion... Oh by the way, They are arming these people now days.
  • FDA
  • TSA
  • IRS This is the Queen seed barer that that perpetuates all the preceding acts of violence by this insanity coming from Washington.

Look we are at a tipping point in American history. We are no longer endowed with the luxury of time. Please be informed and vote then keep the pressure on to restore the liberty so WE the American people can restore the wealth...

We are having a large 400+ attendance Tea Party Event September 29 @ 7PM 2012 at our Gun and Survival store ZOMBIEMFG   location 6344 W Bell Road Glendale, AZ 85310

also check our Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/zombiemfg

Call if you like 602-688-6774

Please tell me what you think

 

 

 

Read more…

IS FINGER POINTING RACIST?

Recently we have heard a lot about the finger pointing incident on The Tarmac by Governor Jan Brewer at President Barack Obama.  The incident is now being proclaimed as a racial situation, and The Governor is being blamed by Jessie Jackson and others as causing division, and calls are being made to smear her name.  It has even being suggested that her actions may cause The President to be assassin...ated. I am not writing this note to debate the ethical question of whether or not this incident is right, wrong, or disrespectful.  I wish here to address the issue of whether or not those that accuse this incident of being racial have any merit. How Race entered into this situation based on a picture is beyond belief.  It seems as if those that will use discrimination as an excuse to divide us will stoop to any level to cause racial strife as a way of maintaining themselves in a position of power. Prior to this event, Governor Brewer has not to my knowledge ever been mentioned or charged as a person with a history of racial discrimination.  If we are to be suspect of any one of the two, the lot would fall on our President as he is the one with the history of promoting class warfare, and standing along the side of the likes of Jeremiah Wright as he proclaimed Black Liberation Theology (a doctrine of hate) from the Church that he attended for over twenty years.  Our President also stands with The Attorney General Eric Holder who refuses to prosecute The Black Panthers for intimidation against Whites. Many Blacks have jumped on the band wagon and are blaming Governor Brewer of being a Racist because they accuse her of wanting to “set a Black man of power straight.”  They accuse her of using the opportunity to promote her new book, and to show the nation that she has the nerve to stand up and put him back in his place publicly. They also point out that it is disrespectful for someone White to ever point a finger in a Black persons face in public because of the dark racial history of our country. They also have failed to take into account that our current President, Barack Obama has himself repeated this gesture on several occasions to State Officials and foreign leaders.  Are we to assume that his actions were Reverse Discrimination? We need to approach this situation with caution and with the facts.  We have enough problems in America and should not add fuel to the fire by placing charges of racial hatred to incidents simply because of a picture or historical stereotypes.  Many people also exercise their freedom of speech with incident hand gestures that may not carry any measure of contempt in their appearance. Let us not rush to judgment and accuse others of such a serious charge before we investigate the facts.  We must move on and tackle the problems that are pressing this country.  We must not use The Race Card to unjustly cause someone to receive scorn.  We must move forward and unite as One America and maintain our respect for one another.
Read more…

Rajjpuut's Folly: Used that Brain Lately?

Items of Interest for Thinking Americans
Item: According to pollsters at Rasmussen Reports, 43% of Americans believe that government programs increase poverty in the nation while just 22% of the nation’s likely-voting adults believe that those programs decrease poverty. 23% say they have no impact. 33% of all voters say the government anti-poverty programs are at least somewhat effective. 62% disagree and say they’re not effective. This includes 7% who believe the programs are Very Effective and 21% who say they are Not At All Effective.
Item: You GO, Arizona. They’ve done it again in Arizona where Proposition 106 (the Healthcare Freedom Act for Arizona) would amend the Arizona Constitution to prohibit any law from compelling any person, employer or health care provider to participate in any health care system, allow a person or employer to pay directly for lawful health care services without being penalized or fined, and allows health care providers to accept direct payment for lawful health care services without being penalized or fined. Besides Obamacare being a mad law in a multitude of ways and increasing the National Debt it’s horrifically complicated and creates 388 brand new federal agencies or offices. Yeah, Arizona!
Item: the recently defeated Defense Funding Bill had provisions about illegal aliens; openly homosexual behavior in the armed forces; and abortion . . . wonder if there was anything in there about the military’s budget?
Item: According to Rasmussen, 52% of Likely U.S. Voters say their own views are closer to Sarah Palin’s than they are to President Obama’s, while only 40% say their views are closer to the president’s than to those of the former Alaska governor and Republican vice presidential candidate. Within the Political Class, however, 68% say their views are more like Obama’s, while 63% of Mainstream voters describe their own views as more like Palin’s.
Eighty-four percent (84%) of Republicans and 59% of voters not affiliated with either major party say their views are more like Palin’s. Eighty-one percent (81%) of Democrats say they think more like the president. White House Press secretary Robert Gibbs last week said Palin is perhaps “the most formidable force in the Republican Party right now,” but just 22% of all voters agree. Fifty-two percent (52%) do not believe Palin is the party’s most formidable force. Twenty-six percent (26%) aren’t sure.
Item: bumper stickers on a hybrid-electric car . . . “Save the polar bears, stop global warming” and “Don’t vote, it just encourages the bums” Sounds like the Dems are praying for a very light turnout . . . perhaps the bears will save them?
Item: Barack Obama’s aunt from Kenya, an illegal alien for several years, claims the U.S. now owes her an American citizenship.
Item: 50% of Americans give Obama a “poor” rating on economic issues, according to Rasmussen while 35% rate his performance on jobs and the economy as either excellent or good. 71% of Americans say the best way to create jobs is to cut taxes while only 17% prefer increased government spending as the best way to create jobs. In another poll, 61% of Americans want Obamacare repealed with 56% saying it will be bad for the country and 61% saying it will increase federal deficits and the national debt.
Item: Because of the new Obamacare regulations beginning to kick in or threatening to kick in by 2014, some insurance companies have dropped child coverage . . . which would soon be mandated till age 26 under their parents’ carrier by Obamacare and would even be required regardless of pre-existing circumstances no matter if the parents waited until their children were sick before signing up for coverage.
Item: Ever heard the term “shovel-ready?” The stimulus bill that funded a lot of $10,000 “your stimulus dollars at work” signs, liberal art projects and esoteric research grants immediately, but which was supposed to quickly get the country back to work with shovel-ready projects has apparently set up an almost impenetrable red-tape obstacle course for legitimate businesses seeking stimulus funds. Many reports exist of would-be employers spending a year or more seeking to clear legal hurdles thrown up before them to prevent their hiring of new people and receiving stimulus funds.
Item: Reports that officially the recession ended in May, 2009, appear to have been greatly exaggerated since the country’s lost more jobs than it created during the ensuing fifteen months.
Item: 56% of the HOPE-benefitted students (Helping Outstanding Students Educationally) did NOT need any financial help in Georgia (the originating state) and across the country and not surprisingly, HOPE programs are running out of money without helping very many needy students.
Item: Medical marijuana has caused police departments across the nation huge problems deciding who’s legal and who’s not and even who’s a dealer and who’s not.
Item: Remember Rachel Carson’s ecological disaster, ‘er ecological masterpiece Silent Spring? The sixty million malaria deaths that have occurred each year since DDT was banned (in 1971 only 43,000 deaths worldwide from Malaria occurred, today two million die from malaria annually) despite the paucity of scientific evidence (which actually amounts to zero scientific evidence) she provided have got scientists debating the virtue of a world without mosquitoes. Most say their environments might “hiccup” and then go on as normal. How do you kill several dozen TRillion of something? They’re working on it . . . . Rajjpuut suggests that mosquitoes, damn them, play an important role in pollination. The males (which don’t bite) are nectar drinkers and the scientists should know that. Kill ‘em, kill a lot of ‘em and prevent malaria and the other eight awful diseases they carry, but don’t go too far.
Item: President Obama recently denied that he and his administration have repeatedly vilified business and denied that Americans are growing frustrated with his job performance but he did it in a very strange way . . . “IF I was green or I was purple, people are still going to be upset if they have no job or they’re losing their home; we’ve done everything we could to buck up businesses.” Hmmmmm besides his grammar mistake . . . what exactly has the president’s color got to do with the economy? Somebody send the “too-cerebral” Barack a book on the subjunctive and remind him, that despite his much ballyhooed “post-racial presidency,” everything in this country is NOT related to someone’s skin color. And NO, MR. PRESIDENT, taking over businesses is NOT the same as bucking them up.
Item: The “Dream Bill” to benefit illegal aliens and “Don’t Ask-Don’t Tell” repeal amendments within the Obama defense budget proposal were rejected again today, both for the umpteenth time. There seems to be no statute of limitations for relief from facing ill-conceived laws.
Item: Why is it that no conservatives or Republicans ever mentions that 4.2% of Blacks voted for McCain and 48% of Whites voted for Obama (more than and a higher percentage than either Kerry or Gore received) when racism is implied as something that Whites only are guilty of?
Item: Some Republicans are coming to the rescue of Ms. Christine O’Donnell their Delaware senate nominee recently lambasted by Karl Rove and others. It seems to Ol’ Rajjpuut that Rove’s got it right and that Mr. Castle (whom O’Donnell defeated) was preferable to a one-time witch and an admitted present-time Marxist (Coombs, her Democratic opponent) . . . good work TEA Party Express.
Item: Obama’s still telling his “car in the ditch” lie . . . why don’t conservatives or Republicans remind the Democrats that with their help and ACORN’s abuse and 30 years of CRA ’77 mortgage-guarantee law and its expansions they took the country from ¼ of 1 percent bad home loans to 34% of all home loans being fiscally-irresponsible and granted at less than 3% down payment . . . why not remind progressives and Democrats that they created the sub-prime lending crisis and Obama’s treasury secretary recently said that without G.W. Bush’s 2007 law the recession would have been much deeper and home prices would have plummeted . . . why is this never mentioned?
Item: the Democrats and Obama Administration have made a big deal about them being behind “extending the Obama tax-cuts to the middle-class” while the Republicans, they say, want tax-cuts for millionaires. FACT CHECK. It is impossible to extend what doesn’t exist. There are no “Obama tax cuts for the middle-class” being presently discussed; the cuts in question are about nine years old now and were created by the Bush administration. Secondly, the Republicans want to extend tax-cuts to 100% of Americans while Obama wants to raise taxes on the job providers, the vast majority of which are not millionaires but rather individuals earning more than $200,000 or couples earning more than $500,000. Meanwhile Mr. Obama and his administration have pointedly refused to bring up legislation to extend his stimulus bill’s “Making Work Pay Tax Credit” which provided individuals up to $400 and couples up to $800 in credits from their withholding. If anything could be called an “Obama middle-class tax cut” that would have been it. But the Administration has pointedly NOT created a budget this year and any MWPTC tax cut extension would either have to be passed within the overall budget or raised as a separate item . . . which the Dems have also pointedly decided NOT to do thus far. Whatever names you call them by, eliminating such programs amounts to a willful tax increase which is a monstrously bad idea during a recession, much less a severe recession.
Read more…

obama bashes arizona

Obama Hauls Arizona Before the UN Human Rights Council
By Ben Johnson, Floyd Reports

Apparently Barack Obama is not content to make a federal case out of his immigration feud with Arizona; he wants to make it an international one.

The president’s first-ever report on U.S. human rights to the UN Human Rights Council contains a rich vein of offensive material. So far, one aspect has not been reported: our petty president used the situation to bash Arizona’s immigration law. Throughout the report — while sounds like an Obama campaign speech — the president discusses “the original flaw” of the U.S. Constitution, America’s tolerance for slavery, and his version of our long and despicable history of discriminating against and oppressing minorities, women, homosexuals, and the handicapped. After each complaint, he addresses how he is delivering us from ourselves, patting himself on the back for such initiatives as ending “torture,” promoting Affirmative Action, and passing health care legislation.

In his section on “Values and Immigration,” he praised the Department of Homeland Security’s efforts to provide better medical care for detainees and increase “Alternatives To Detention” (e.g., letting them go). Then he turned to the one state that has had the temerity to stand in his way of fundamentally transforming the American electorate:
Read more…

Flap over Rolling Stone Article Highlights

Obama Leadership Lack

Wow, the mainstream media waxed orgasmic. Calling Barack Obama “BRILLIANT” so often today, you'd be forgiven for thinking Obama was Wellington defeating Napoleon. Obama repeatedly received these unrestrained accolades for the firing of top Afghan War General Stanley Mc Chrystal for Stanley Mc’s absured lack of good judgment shown by a) letting a Leftist hatchet** artist journalist embed with the top command in Afghanistan and B) for Mc Chrystal and his top aides flapping their mouths disrespectfully when referring to civilian leadership and c) doing so in front of that Leftist journalist Michael Hastings and d) for blaming the civilian leadership for their own lack of results on the ground.

Let’s be clear here: Mc Chrystal acted like a malcontent recruit not like the genius military leader he was reputed to be. Obama’s move was the only even semi-logical thing he could do . . . the fully logical things would have been to have given the war effort the full 40,000 surge troops request, to give them back in August when requested and to have never been so stupid as to give out a firm “withdrawal date” in advance. That last move is known by those who understand strategic issues as “aiding and comforting the enemy.”

Let us go further, the Obama administration besides second-guessing the surge request and dithering for five months before giving only part of what was asked for . . . besides all that, the Obama administration lacks a real strategy to fight terror either at home or around the globe. In fact, except for extreme good luck so far as seen in the case of the underwear bomber and the boob trying to bomb Times Square . . . there have been virtually NO successes on the terror front since Obama became president. LUCK is definitely NOT a solid strategy for keeping our people safe at home and for winning the War in Afghanistan. WE ARE AT WAR and have been demonstrably so since Osama Bin Laden openly and defiantly and proudly declared war against us in 1992 . . . and officially so since 9/11/2001.

Today, however, we are told we are NOT at war. There is no terror or terrorism, just “man-caused disasters.” NO, Mr. Obama, the Titanic is a man-caused disaster. And, of course, the contortionism required to eliminate accurate and necessary words like Islam, Muslim, radicals, Jihadists, etc. and to avoid the appearance of any GASP, conspiracy with Al Queda in Yemen at its root . . . any old-time vaudevillest would be super proud of the administration's tap dance around the full disclosure of the truth.

House Minority Leader, Boehner’s commented a while back, "The Obama administration has spoon-fed the American people bland reassurances, saying this was a 'one-off' and a 'lone wolf.' This is the rhetoric of an administration that continues to operate without a real, comprehensive plan to confront and defeat the terrorist threat." Of course, the always “out-to-lunch” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi rejected the obvious truth that luck was the reason for the Times Square plot’s failure. "Oh please, please," she said. "The harder we work the luckier we get, and I think that's sort of the point” as she implied vigilant citizens are one part of the administration's “comprehensive strategy” to combat terrorism, which goes hand in hand with law enforcement.

Really? What public-service messages have gone out educating citizens what to do? how to do it? who to contact? what kind of vigil would be most helpful? and most importantly how to get lucky? President Lincoln’s body-guard relied on luck, too, Nancy-dear. John Wilkes Booth drilled a tiny spyhole in the back of the presidential box in Ford's theater so he could reconnoiter the situation accurately and he had an effective plan that worked even though he did his dastardly deed without trying to hide his identity and while using totally unnecessary flair (jumping upon stage and yelling, “Sic semper, tyrannis!”) . . . for the sake of our people's well-being, let’s give our present enemies at least as much credit.

Mr. Obama is instead currently also relying upon luck to hopefully keep a bloodbath from occurring inside Arizona and other border states, not to mention Islamic radical terror plots. Just as the blood on the hands of the Islamic terrorist who perpetrated the Ft. Hood massacre is also on Barack Obama’s hands, so too is the blood that’s sure to flow inside our border states. Yes, we need a brilliant president who is “decisive, firm and bold,” but Barack Obama fails on all four counts . . . .

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery, (we wish you exceptionally well General Petraeus!)

Rajjpuut
** the same fellow once travelled around with Bill O'Reilly for about a week and rather than giving an accurate portrayal, carefully picked his partial-quotes and anecdotes taken out of context to make O'Reilly sound like he was baised and unintelligent.
Read more…

The 10th Amendment of the Constitution is just one more part of the United States Constitution that Barack Obama finds objectionable. While NOT deliberately spitting on two different*** Arizona laws (created because of federal government dithering over the little matter of immigration law enforcement to help border states) or on the Constitution itself, Obama’s disdain for real American statesmanship and the real American Constitution is obvious. To think just seventeen short months ago he rose his hand and swore to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" -- after his actions of those past months who can ever believe anything the man says? Obama and his administration have expressed “grave concern” over both Arizona illegal immigration laws but is going to court to fight the most recently written one. Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, spoiling for a fight on 10th Amendment grounds called Obama's decision "outrageous" but "not surprising" after Obama administration officials confirmed Friday that they plan to file a lawsuit challenging the state's anti-illegal immigration law. "Our federal government should be using its legal resources to fight illegal immigration, not the law-abiding citizens of Arizona," the fiesty Brewer said.

Meanwhile, the Arizona Attorney General, Terry Goddard, said his office plans to withdraw as the state's lawyers in legal challenges to the law, leaving Brewer's handpicked attorneys to defend it. Goddard, a Democrat said to be planning to run for the Arizona governorship for a third time after two earlier failures to win election, and Brewer a Republican have squabbled repeatedly about the law. To a certain extent that’s not been a bad thing.

After Goddard made his objections known to the earliest permutation of the Arizona law, A) the original law was strengthened B) provisions were added to directly address Goddard’s and Obama’s and many Democrats’ objections to the possibility of police officers using the new law as an excuse for “racial profiling” and C) Brewer had a special provision added saying that the Arizona governor could defend the new version of the law however she chose, rather than being required to fight legal challenges to the law and her state’s rights to protect itself from the illegal invasion from the south (which has made Phoenix the #2 kidnap city in the world only behind drug capital Bogota, Colombia) with a lukewarm state attorney general in center stage. Brewer said "I will ensure the immigration laws we passed are vigorously defended all the way to the United States Supreme Court if necessary, where this reasonable law will ultimately be found constitutional," something she wasn’t sure Goddard was prepared to do whole-heartedly.

The law taking effect July 29 requires state police officers to question a person's immigration status if there's a reasonable suspicion that he or she is in the country illegally. Five or six legal challenges have been filed to the law since April virtually all claiming that the new law will lead to “racial profiling” and it’s the federal government’s responsibility to regulate immigration. Duh! And what about the present climate when the federal government believes illegal immigration benefits it? Mr. Obama has made no pretext of defending the border. He is seeking so-called comprehensive immigration “reform,” a weasel term meaning the power to grant citizenship to the 14-25 million illegals now in the country since it's generally accepted that 80% or more of them would vote Democratic and ensure Obama’s re-election in 2012. He has thus far been told he hasn't the votes to pass such a bill into law.

On Friday evening, June 18, Brewer's defense team asked a federal judge to throw out suits by the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups challenging the law's constitutionality. Recently, Obama officials confirmed plans to file their lawsuit after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in an interview with a TV station in Ecuador (nice that U.S. citizens hear about the matter from a foreign TV station, eh?) earlier this month that the administration would challenge the law in court, though officials had long said the issue was under review. The administration at this point is just building its case and definitely expects to file suit. Brewer told Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren, she's ready for a fight.

"What a disappointment," Brewer said on Thursday, adding she was shocked the administration would make such an announcement on foreign TV without giving Arizona officials the news first. "We are NOT going to back away from this issue," Brewer said. "We are going to pursue it, we're going to be very aggressive," Brewer said. "We'll meet them in court ... And we will win. The citizens of America agree with Arizona."

Meanwhile the Obama administration has thus far failed to deliver promised National Guard troops to the border states. Obama’s original promise was to send unarmed National Guardsmen to “relieve” the paperwork and other pressures from U.S. Border Patrol officers . . . but even that pathetic pledge has been broken.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut
*** Obama has also let known his displeasure with an earlier Arizona law that allows the state to suspend the licenses or refuse licensing of businesses repeatedly violating the national immigration laws by KNOWINGLY hiring illegal aliens. Attorney General Eric Holder has called both laws "unconstitutional." Apparently, in the case of the employers' law, once again Eric Holder has not read the law he's criticizing. The latest provision to the nation's immigration laws along those lines passed in the mid '80's says that the Federal Government canNOT get involved in licensing of businesses and that aspect is left for state regulation.
Read more…

The u.s. Has been invaded!

6-18-10 Arizona is a good example of the leftist movement in our federal government. That state is trying desperately to defend itself and its citizens from criminals, drug runners, human traffickers, gun smugglers, drug cartels, financial ruin, and the failure of our federal government to do its job. They passed State Senate Bill 1070 to be able to implement some of the protections the federal government has failed to provide.


We have been invaded, but the federal government does nothing of any substance to stop the invasion. No, I am not referring to the estimated 12 to 14 million criminal aliens known to be here. I am referring to the flow of paramilitary groups and other heavily armed foreigners who have already come across an 80 mile stretch of the U.S. / Mexican border including the Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge which is right on the border. These people commit crimes against U.S. Citizens and law enforcement officers. The crimes have increased in the last four months to where the situation is out of control according to Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu. The invaders have taken over to the extent that our federal government has closed the wildlife refuge to U.S. citizens. So this part of the United States has been taken over by foreign nationals and is off limits to U.S. Citizens. And all our federal government has seen fit to do is to erect signs telling U.S. citizens they may not enter this area of U.S. sovereign territory. They have not sent troops to rout these foreign invaders. They have not even thought that doing so is a reasonable idea.


So let me see if I understand the situation. Mr. Obama refuses to protect this country; but in stead, he believes the right thing to do is to allow invaders to take over our land. He also believes that when Arizona passes a law to protect itself from such failings of our President and our federal government, that the state should be sued for usurping the federal government’s powers regarding immigration. Arizona doesn’t want to control legal immigration - it wants to halt illegal entry into the state. However, the reason the state passed 1070 was because the all-powerful federal government is not using its power to protect its citizens.


The most important thing here is that the President is refusing to protect the this country. If I remember right, he took an oath to protect this country. I guess he just failed and the country is giving him a pass on it. If he were a Republican President, the Democrats would be calling for his impeachment. But I guess the Republicans are just blind to the situation…………..or they are gutless…………..or something.


Where is the citizenry’s cry for the impeachment of a President who refuses to honor his oath?


Foxnews.com carried the article on which this writing is based. It can be found at: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/06/16/closes-park-land-mexico-border-americans/?test=latestnews.


If the public reads this blog and the Fox News article and understands that our own President is making part of this country off limits to its own citizens because of a foreign takeover, they would be up for an impeachment. However, the President doesn’t even want this subject mentioned because he stopped construction of the border fence and did not provide any of the 3000 troops requested by Arizona and Senator McCaine to take back this part of our country. If the subject is mentioned, he would look bad. But the facts are there. So again, I ask where is the citizenry’s cry for the impeachment of a President who refuses to honor his oath?

Read more…

It’s never a good sign when the leader of the free world seemingly starts substituting crack-cocaine for his two and a half-pack a day cigarette habit. Too harsh a judgment? Listen up, then judge for yourself.

Item One:
As you know, President Obama and his administration have lately bad-mouthed the recently created Arizona immigration law in a cynical attempt to activate the Democratic Party base for this November’s mid-term elections. Well, now the stakes have been raised by the president who seems intent upon showing the world how little he respects the opinion of the common American citizens and common-sense itself. Mr. Obama has turned the White House legal-beagles upon Arizona again. This time the target is Arizona’s anti-illegal alien employer sanctions. Mr. Obama again says Arizona is acting beyond its jurisdiction, illegal immigration in every aspect is 100% a federal responsibility, and ONLY a federal responsibility, according to him and he says his White House attorneys will issue a legal challenge to Arizona. What’s wrong with all that?

Item A: The federal law concerning employers of illegals does say that states CAN control the licensing of such companies. In fact, the applicable law from 1986 forbids the federal government from doing anything at all to employers and puts all possibility of dealing with these companies under state control.

Item B: The Arizona anti-alien employer laws in Arizona are 100% in line with federal laws. To wit: for any firm found guilty of KNOWINGLY hiring undocumented workers a violation in Arizona would result in suspension of the business’s privilege of operating for an unspecified time possibly as little as ten days. A second violation of this law by an employer within three years of the first violation would forbid the company from doing business in Arizona.

Item C: Most surprisingly, the Arizona law has already been challenged and upheld by the single most liberal court in the country. In effect Mr. Obama is calling the Federal Court in San Francisco’s 9th District “too conservative.” Wow!

Item D: Ex- Arizona Governor Napolitano now, the Obama Homeland Security Secretary, was behind the passage of this law which Obama is now calling illegal and ill-advised.

Item Two: Mr. Obama (who himself refuses to respect the Pledge of Allegiance and stand at attention with his hand over his heart during its recital or to recite it himself) and his enthusiastic and violently active followers are sneakily trying to change the wording of the pledge in American minds.

You’ll recall the words in question are “one nation, under God with liberty and justice for all.” Leaving their attack on the word “God” out of things for now . . . the word popping up everywhere that socialists march in the street is “FAIRNESS” and the mantra that is heard in every such demonstration is “fairness and justice.” Apparently Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother** never told baby Barack that “life isn’t fair.” Rajjpuut would add that inflicting one-person’s or one group’s idea of fairness upon the rest of the people by forced equality, for one example re-distribution of wealth as a policy, is the ultimate threat to LIBERTY. Fairness and equality are the key words in communist and socialist dogma. Only one type of fairness and one type of equality matter: equal justice before the law and due process.

Item Three: Your ears are not deceiving you. President Obama is now choosing to use the oil spill for politics, of course. As part of his renewed attack on the oil industry, he’s talking about stopping or suspending all offshore oil drilling. That will really help the gulf jobs situation, won’t it? More importantly, he’s started heating up for his evil^^ cap and tax bill all over again; and praising Spain and its green-industry and talking about “weaning ourselves of oil-dependence.” Unmentioned by Mr. Obama is that Spain, once the economic poster child for the European Union, had a vibrant economy with only 3% unemployment a few years back. Then Spain instituted a green jobs program and now has 21% unemployment. Each green job cost $677,000. Each green jobs cost taxes that eliminated 2.2 jobs in the real free market economy. The average green job lasted less than six months and only 10% of green jobs proved permanent with an average salary of $13-$14 per hour. So, if Mr. Obama creates the five million green jobs he’s boasting about . . . expect a loss of eleven million real jobs. Expect the average 90% of the green jobs to be temporary only and only 500,000 permanent green jobs to be created . . . in short, expect the ultimate financial Armageddon.

Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

** How come Americans were NOT told by mainstream media fully investigating his background that Barack Obama was raised in a communist household, by a communist mother and grandfather and his birth-father (subject of Obama’s first autobiography “Dreams from My Father”) was extolling the virtues of 100% taxation and “scientific socialism” a.k.a. communism in Kenya when his son was three years old (http://www.politico.com/static/PPM41_eastafrica.html) and about his Marxist associates?

^^Cap and trade will turn a $15 TRillion economy into a $25 TRillion economy without one new manufactured good or without one new service provided. How? by raising costs 67% for virtually every single item or service in the country. That extra $10 TRillion is aimed right at progressive pockets. Mr. Gore, Mr. Obama, Richard Sandor, Franklin Raines, Joel Rogers, Goldman Sachs, and a good 10-12 progressive foundations and at least a score of other progressive politicians will all be monstrously enriched if and when cap and trade legislation becomes law and their Chicago Climate Exchange becomes obscenely profitable. And, of course, it’s all based upon saying that the carbon dioxide we exhale is dangerous to the planet . . . a proven LIE, as reported by the London Times when they exposed the Climate-Gate data falsification.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936289.ece

Read more…
In honor of the memories of Harry S Truman (just a letter no middle name), Ronald Wilson Reagan and John Fitzgerald Kennedy, three of the most diligent and competent statesmen in world history, Rajjpuut will be awarding a monthly Truman-Reagan-Kennedy Award for statesmanship. Whole encyclopedias could be written about these three men.
Truman, a hero in World War I made the courageous decision to drop the atom bomb ending World War II and saving an estimated one million American fighting men from death or wounding. He also inspired the Dixiecrats to leave the Democratic Party at great political risk to himself, Truman who was raised a segregationist, integrated the armed forces. And unlike his successor Eisenhower, Truman was an immediate and powerful vocal opponent of Joe McCarthy and his communist witch hunts.
Reagan personally intervened to get the final funding and stinger missiles that spelled the defeat of the Big Red Soviet Military Machine in Afghanistan. His confrontational style (“Tear Down This Wall, Mr. Gorbachev!”) but willingness to talk face-to-face helped bring about the fall of communism and the Warsaw Pact, the end of the Soviet Union and Cold War and yes, the smashing of the Berlin Wall: not a bad legacy for “the Great Communicator!”
Kennedy inspired warm hope among jaded American voters. He, like Reagan, made a courageous speech in the shadow of the Berlin Wall. Most importantly, Kennedy stood tough upon discovering that the Soviet Union had moved missiles to Cuba just 90 miles off America’s shores and put the whole world on a nuclear disaster watch by blockading the island and demanding removal of the missiles. Like his book “Profiles in Courage,” Kennedy, a World War II hero, practiced what he preached.
The May, 2010, Truman-Reagan-Kennedy Statesmanship Award WINNER is:
Arizona Governor Jan Brewer
As the chief executive of the state of Arizona, Jan Brewer has done what the chief executive of the nation, Barack Obama, will NOT do. She has put in motion steps to help protect her state from the endless swarm of undocumented aliens illegally crossing into her state. The impact in Arizona just on law enforcement these illegals have brought into the state has been horrendous. Drugs and drug dealers, other felons and petty criminals now overload the Arizona system and some of their crimes include murder and kidnapping. Next to world drug capital Bogota, Colombia, Phoenix, the Arizona capital city is now the #2 hotspot for world kidnapping. The cost to the state in overloaded health care, welfare and school resources is bringing her closer to bankruptcy like her neighbor state California every day. Brewer oversaw creation of a state immigration law based upon the federal immigration statutes and had the courage to stand up to the immense pressure brought by Obama and his minions.
Let us congratulate the May, 2010, Winner of the Truman-Reagan-Kennedy Statesmanship Award: Arizona Governor Jan Brewer
Ya'all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
Read more…



To honor the memory of the Last Great American Statesman, William Proxmire (Wisconsin Senator for 32 years) whose “Golden Fleece Awards” uncovered shameless pork barrel projects and focused media attention on all manner of self-serving, waste, and corruption in the United States government: Rajjpuut has since June, 2009, been awarding the “Platinum Fleecer” to the elected or appointed official or private citizen most deserving of the illustrious title.

The May, 2010 Platinum Fleecer WINNER is:
President Barack Obama
Does the country get its money’s worth from their president? He certainly seems disposed to keeping those dollars in Washington, D.C., doesn’t he? A monstrous “Thousand Year Flood” hit Tennessee, Kentucky and Mississippi but Obama has not yet even mentioned these people’s plight nor used the words “disaster area.” Oklahoma and surrounding states have been hit three times by savage and deadly tornadoes, but again no mention of their sad situation and no federal assistance mentioned. The Gulf oil leak went on for five weeks before he seemed to realize it was happening . . . now, in fairness British Petroleum has the technology and Obama can do nothing along those lines, but . . . certainly the problems near and onshore created by the mess were easily predictable. Let’s say he had four full weeks to come up with a federal response to prepare a defense for them, to soften the blow for Louisiana and the other Gulf States and he did? Nothing?
Actually worse than nothing, he had the power to eliminate red tape so that Louisiana could have built some artificial barrier island constructs . . . but Obama insisted that the EPA do an environmental-impact study before that could begin (and it hasn't yet!). Let's see, you have some potential, presumably modest or absolutely minor future impact versus a monstrous absolutely certain impact NOW and we need to study that?????? Nice work, Mr. Prez!
Meanwhile he is putting every effort into passing “America’s Power Act” a Democratic euphemism for “cap and trade” legislation. Remember in his own words, “Under my policies, electricity costs would necessarily skyrocket!” Skyrocketing costs based upon a proven** fraudulent lie called global warming? Meanwhile he’s seeking to pass “comprehensive immigration reform” which means making 13-20 million illegal aliens American citizens within ten months (expecting to win 80% of their votes and lock in his re-election and the supremacy of the Democratic Party progressives for the next 50 years). Meanwhile he refuses to protect our borders and rants and raves about Arizona's attempts to protect theirs. Yeah, that’s a statesman for you. Congratulations, to Barack Obama the only four-time winner and May, 2010 Platinum Fleecer of the Month.
Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
** here's the truth from the ultra-LIBERAL London Times which had been banging the drum for global warming for almost a dozen years . . . they ate crow and released the truth which no American mainstream media source has done (still protecting our president and Al Gore!) . . . . here's the London Times story:

Read more…


Obama's ICE Head Considers Refusing to Deport Arizona Illegals

Arizona is hoping mightily that the boycott against their state catches on quickly, yes, you read that right. The thinking in Phoenix is that once the law actually takes effect, illegal aliens will join the boycott against their state and go elsewhere taking their drugs and violence with them and the state will profit mightily budgetwise, not to mention safetywise. That’s one reason that 57% of Americans now say they wish their state had an immigration law such as Arizona created and that 83% of Americans “say” they want the federal government holding up its end on enforcing the nation’s borders. Recently, a top Obama immigration official implied that ICE (the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency) might choose “not to deport any Arizona-arrested illegals,” doesn’t that just warm the cockles of your heart with love for our president and his administration?
John Morton, ICE head, recently said his agency will NOT process all illegal immigrants referred to them by Arizona police officers. He also said, "I don't think the Arizona law or laws like it are the solution." Sounds like someone's kissing Barack's butt cheeks, eh?
"Putting caps on which criminals we'll take… I think that's a clear conflict," says Mark Spencer with the Phoenix Law Enforcement Association. "You have a bad criminal and a good criminal, you have a bad child molester and a good child molester, you have a bad illegal alien, a good illegal alien, good drug dealer, bad drug dealer… that's absurd." If ICE won't process a suspected illegal immigrant, the sheriff says they can be booked on a misdemeanor crime established by SB 1070 and suggests he might have to establish “tent-cities” for the overflow until deportation can occur. Wow, talk about your strong incentives for illegals to boycott Arizona . . . 112 degreees in the shade can get mighty unattractive, Rajjpuut says.
The official Obama number is 13-14 million illegal aliens now living in the United States. The real number is closer to 20-25 million according to estimates by conservative sources. Barack Obama is seeking via yet another “reform”^^ to make all those illegals over the age of 14 (an estimated 83% of them) into citizens. If, as suspected 80% of those 83% would cast votes for Democrats, he will have presumably locked in his party as the controlling entity in this country for the next 100 years since the single highest birth rate among the populace is within the Hispanic community. But the problem isn’t all away off in the possible future . . . Felipe Calderone and Barack Obama are conveniently overlooking the fact that thanks to the Federal Reserve Bans and the financial industry, Illegal Mexicans (that is just those illegals from Mexico, not including all those from Guatemala, Honduras and the rest of Central America) transfer roughly $22 Billion into the Mexican economy while also using up $284 Billion in American welfare programs and other “freebies.”
The so-called “remittance program” called Directo a Mexico overseen by the federal reserve banks is the culprit here. This program is so lax that Mexican drug lords use them to safely transfer money back to their homeland rather than risk carrying large amounts of cash southward. This mooching is only part of the problem. Mexican criminals importing their drugs and violence also add another $85 Billion in drain on our economy’s law enforcement. Obama and his Democrats applauded Calderone as he criticized the sovereign state of Arizona . . .
Rajjpuut says, deport tha A-hole Calderone along with those 20 million other leeches and the Federal Reserve and Obama and all others who are abetting all the illegality on our borders. Would you be surprised to know that federal reserve bankers inform illegal aliens that their savings are safe no matter what . . . if they get thrown in jail, if they get deported, if they lose their account number, no matter . . . the money gets to Mexico. And the drug cartels? There couldn’t be a more friendly money-laundering agency than your local federal reserve bank.
Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
^^ You didn’t realize that “reform” meant “obnoxious, expensive and unwanted CHANGE,” now did you? Yeah, Rajjpuut neither. Bet you always thought “reform” meant “improvement.”
Read more…
Rasmussen Polls Highlight Big Opposition
to Obama Socialist Agenda

If socialism and big government are the desired ends, Americans are not buying it according to the highly accurate Rasmussen Reports polling service.

Item: 68% of Americans are against boycotts of Arizona over their new Immigration law. While Obama and the federal government are permitted 17 specific powers, 55% of voters would like a law like Arizona’s in their own state because they don’t believe the federal government is protecting our borders.

Item: when it comes to terrorism, 52% of voters say we are NOT safer today than we were on September 10, 2001 just before the 9/11 attacks.

As the rest of the poll data shows, it seems that in the voters’ eyes Mr. Obama is NOT doing what the federal government is supposed to do and doing everything else instead. It also appears that Americans do NOT want to be ruled from the left . . . or the right or the center, but want to rule themselves:

Item: 72% do not believe Congress knows what it’s doing when it comes to the economy. Along those lines, 41% expressed the opinion that a group of people randomly selected from the phone book would do a better job than Congress.

Item: Rasmussen’s Daily Presidential Tracking Poll shows President Obama’s favorability rating stands at -18 with only 25% of voters highly approving of the job he’s doing and 43% highly disapproving. Overall 44% at least somewhat approve of the President’s work while 55% disapprove.

Item: It appears Nancy Pelosi was wrong when she said, “We’ll just have to pass it so people can see what’s in it (and you’ll love it)” in reference to the Obamacare health measures. 63% of American voters now favor repealing the bill. As a move toward socialism, roughly 390 separate government agencies are created by Obamacare – just one law. In contrast only 40 separate federal agencies were created by Franklin Delano Roosevelt in just over twelve years in office. Obama has been in office fifteen months.

Item: 65% of all Americans and a surprising 51% of Democrats now espouse “mainstream”^^ views up from 62% in March and 55% in September. Only 4% now support the “political class” (those numbers are staying steady at the lowest such reading in Rasmussen polling history). When “leaners” are included 81% align with the mainstream and 12% trend toward the political class.

Item: 67% of mainstream America consider Obamacare “bad for America” while 77% of the political class believe Obamacare is “good for America.”

Item: 76% of Americans say they trust the voters more than they do the politicians and 71% see the federal government as a”special interest group” looking out mainly for its own welfare. 70% believe that the government and big business generally work together for their own benefit against the interests of the people.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

^^The three questions used to calculate the Political Class Index are:

-- Generally speaking, when it comes to important national issues, whose judgment do you trust more - the American people or America’s political leaders?

-- Some people believe that the federal government has become a special interest group that looks out primarily for its own interests. Has the federal government become a special interest group?

-- Do government and big business often work together in ways that hurt consumers and investors?

To create a scale, each response earns a plus 1 for the populist answer, a minus 1 for the political class answer, and a 0 for not sure.

Those who score 2 or higher are considered a populist or part of the Mainstream. Those who score -2 or lower are considered to be aligned with the Political Class. Those who score +1 or -1 are considered leaners in one direction or the other.

In practical terms, if someone is classified with the Mainstream, they agree with the mainstream view on at least two of the three questions and don’t agree with the Political Class on any.

Read more…

United Nations in Geneva and the Swiss

I

I got my email about the U.N. threat. I saw it was sent from their headquarters in Geneva.

Have any of you been to Geneva, Switzerland. I have. My wife is Swiss (and also American).

When you get to Switzerland, as a tourist, you are required to go directly to the local police station, with your passport, and register(if you stay at a hotel, the hotel does this for you).

If you are “suspicious” looking or get stop, you better have checked in.

It is not America. Not check in? You are arrested and then deported.

If we had the Swiss laws and enforcement (when your tourist time is up, if you have not checked out, they hunt you down), there would be no need for the Arizona law.

Read more…
I think the Governer of Arizona is very brave and I think it's about time someone stated that. Yeah it's ok to learn about your own race and contributions but they refuse to let white's do the same sighting it as racism. Oh White's are evil and their heritage is bigoted and hateful to the World. It's amazing how doubled standard this nation has become. Here's their reference for White history, Slavery and K.K.K.. Like that actually represents our history as a whole. Somehow being white automatically makes you racist? Right......... I've actually read some of those ethnic studies and let me tell you, Wow the bigotry can't be found there. LOL!! America, the nation of pandering. We don't have anything racially specific like they do. BET, National Black Caucus, Black History Month, Essence, NAACP, Al Sharpton (lol)and so many more. I thought you coundl't have anything as racially specific in this country because it was racist? Well, thats only true if your white. We will lift up your race and celebrate your incredible histroy while we demonize and degrade ours. I do however believe that such things wouldn't be so bad, as long as white's had the same right to do the same. I'm not ashamed of being White. And no other race will make me feel like being White is a bad thing. Now watch everyone come out their mouth with all kinds of ugly rhetoric towards Arizona now. She's a racist!! She's Hitler!! Please, shut up and stop comparing Nazi Germany to Arizona. That's in no way a proper comparison and I feel since millions of Jews were killed and tortured, to be something very offensive and I'm wondering why no one in the Jewish community has said anything. Are millions of illegal immigrants being rounded up and sent to concentration camps? Are millions of illegal immigrants being gased and starved? Are millions of illegal immigrants being raped or even beaten? NO!! so don't you even dare compare something as horrible as that to some immigration protest. Because what they suffered was in no way the same!! You are the one's with the signs claiming to shoot more police officers. You are the one's claiming to beat white americans with shovels and axes. And you are the one's telling white americans their American flag offends you. You are the one's using racial profile to claim racist rhetoric. By saying the Governer of Arizona is a racist just because she is white!! And calling the Tea Party Racist because the do not agree with the blessed Obama, just because they are white. How hypocritcal can you get? Who's being uncivil? Really? Nah!! That double Standard your a racist because you are White B.S. isn't going to fly anymore. We know who the real racist are and we will oppose you at every step. God Bless!!
Read more…

U.N. can go straight to Hell!!

Now the U.N. is telling American's how to govern their own people? They can go straight to Hell!! Are they currently aware who foot's the majority of U.N. Fund's? We do. They are so unable to act in a way that is unbias. They like to pretend they can accomplish everything without the U.S., and while they show resentment towards us, they are cashing our check. Let's cancel some of those checks and then lets see how much they can truly accomplish? I find no real proof of racism or ethinc discrimination anywhere in Arizona's Law. They want us to keep our border's wide open and unsafe. Why do we support the U.N.? And as for the ethnic studies I don't believe that a race specific class is equality. They are allowed to have a racial Identity and we are not. How is that fair? You try and be proud for being white and they will call it racism. So minorities are encouraged to be proud while whites are demonized for it. and what happens when the minority becomes the majority? Will those practices still be allowed? of course. If your going to be proud for being black, then I'm going to be proud for being white. As simple as that. We may have made mistakes in our past, but whites are not only. Why are Hispanics not mentioned for their part in slavery? Why are African slave traders not mentioned in slavery? Why are Arab's not mentioned for their big part in slavery? Interesting. And are people aware that African's also had African slaves? or that they also had white slaves? Again interseting. And i think it's to funny how African Americans and Hispanic Americans ally themselves with Democrats. It's like they aren't aware that Democrats were actually for slavery. LOL!! Humans are so funny acting. Now I have no problem for racial identity if its fair for all of us. This Nation is full of unfairness and inequality when it comes to race. Why can't we just be human? Anywho I'll be back with more, I need to get some of that good old coffee!! God bless!!
Read more…

Secure borders

Mr. Obama took an oath to uphold the Constitution of The United States, he is suspose to be a Constitutional Lawyer. I think he should re-read Article 4, Section 4. We also should hold him to his affirmation / oath or resign. Never mind the spin. Deport the law breaking illegals and punish those who support them.

Rich R.

Read more…