All Posts (28837)
Sort by
Most insightful TEA Party sign: "What difference does it make what this placard says. You'll call it racist anyway."
Leftist Journalists in Denial as 13+ Year,
400+ Person Rigged-News Conspiracy Exposed
If the most infamous progressive blogsites are any indication . . . it’s corruption as usual from the world of left-wing journalists today four days** after their shoddy little conspiracy was aired in public. The liberals involved in the JournoList (yes, spelled with an ‘o’ not an ‘a’) conspiracy aren’t saying much of anything, holed-up you might say. The vast majority of the rest of the progressives online are also tending to pursed lips also. But there are a few brave liberal souls criticizing Tucker Carlson at DailyCaller.com for “revealing people’s private e-mails” Really? 400 person e-mail groupings comprise “private e-mails?” The Huffington Post, is perhaps the most audacious in brassing it out by repeatedly denying the possibility that “journalists are uniting to push a specific agenda” and referring to the Journolist as just “a place where you can get together to discuss issues freely.” Now that is brassy, stupid, but brassy.
Other progressives are calling the whole thing “innocent” and, “as usual blown out of proportion by the right-wingers.” Let’s see, evidence shows that 400+ left-wing journalists, bloggers, professors and various media-connected types discussed how to deflect attention from Barack Obama’s connection to his pastor Jeremiah Wright by picking any famous conservative, “Barnes, Gingrich, Karl Rove, Glenn Beck, it doesn’t matter and then accusing them of racism.” Yeah, that’s a totally innocent case of plotting to manipulate the news to protect Barack Obama. And since the same process has been rampant since the Great One was elected, the journalistic charge to serve as “Watchdog” for Democracy seems to have been missed by these brave liberal souls.
The liberal, but reasonably fair, Politico.com is finding that they’re being shunned by other left-wing bloggers and journalists because they’re actively searching for answers and GASP, truth! A couple of commenters on liberal sites obliquely accused politico of having “its priorities skewed all out of whack.” One referenced this politico.com long-time favorite link of Rajjpuut’s:
as evidence that “You can’t count on Politico . . . always been red (as in red-stater or Republican) on important issues.” Guess that's what lefties get for choosing truth over politics, eh?
The ability to be outrageously candid on Journolist sometime went to people’s heads. Joe Klein of Time Magazine forgets about the JournoList altogether in one uncharacteristically open moment and exposed his biases for the outside world criticizing the entire Liberal media for being too “hard on Barack Obama instead of giving him the support he deserves.”
Others on the left say, JournoList's influence has been highly exaggerated. Oh yeah, we’ve got women telling the boys to just take one for the team just as they had to back in ’97 feeling all dirty for NOT attacking Clinton in the Monica Lewinsky affair . . . for example Katha Pollit of the Nation: “The people who attacked Clinton on Monica were prissy and ridiculous, but let me tell you it was no fun as a woman and a feminist, waving aside as politically irrelevant and part of the vast rightwing conspiracy Paula, Monica, Jennifer, Kathleen, Juanita, the Avon Lady . . . .” Getting people to drop what they perceive as ethical behavioral standards and biting their tongues doesn’t sound like any small thing to Rajjpuut. In fact he can’t imagine the circumstances under which he’d sell out his personal beliefs so that he could then sell out his journalistic integrity . . . .
Others call it “a pretty professional group that’s been screwed up by the right-wing.” Do they call it "professional" for one woman to say, “. . . if Rush Limbaugh were dying of of a heart attack in front of me, I’d take immense pleasure in watching him writhe on the ground and seeing his eyes bug out . . .”
Little things mean a lot to these people: such as articles NOT mentioning the political party of Democrats in trouble with the law or involved in other scandals, but calling out Republicans even for the most minor of offenses; or repeated coverage of Republican scandals, but little emphasis and one-time mention of even more serious Democratic corruption. Then there’s the quoting of Democrats repeatedly about the undocumented but purported racism of Republicans and TEA Party members without even trying for balance in the stories. The highly evocative accusation becomes the story every time. And most crucial of all, repeated instances of unproven stories and unproven accusations showing up ceaselessly in the liberal media as if they were proven items from history witnessed by a thousand quality eye-witnesses.
The story about the N-word being hurled “23 times” at Black congressmen on the day Obamacare was passed has been printed at least 10,000 times in newspapers or on the internet and likewise broadcast ad nauseum, and yet with all the cameras and other video equipment in evidence that day, still no one has claimed Andrew Breitbarts reward of $100,000 for solid video evidence of just one instance of the N-word being used by a TEA Party member.
The same is true in spades for the accusation that one Black congressman that day was spit on . . . no evidence at all, just accusation; and indeed the supposed recipient of the spittle has NOT come forward to talk about this experience though purportedly he’s a highly respected Black congressman. Rajjpuut would have high respect for him if he came forward and told the truth, something like, “There was a lot of people there and it was pretty scary, but NO, nobody spit on me and I never heard the word ‘nig__r either.” That would be what an honest man would say, but no one’s saying that either . . . better to let sleeping racist accusations lie.
In other words don’t look for the JournoList revelation to change the way the leftwing tries to manipulate the media coverage or non-coverage of news in this country. Indeed, they’ve shut down Journolist but already, they’ve got a replacement going called Cabalist.
It remains to be seen if the leftwing journalists will return to true journalism or continue in their “lapdog ways.” Their criticsim of ABC for breaking the Jeremiah Wright story was incredibly bitter. They’ve already completely avoided the Climate Gate story for almost nine months, the Chicago Climate Exchange Scandal Story for at least five months, and they completely avoided the Van Jones scandal except on the final day when they wrote up the story of how Van Jones had resigned as Green Jobs Czar with no mention at all of the scandal involved. It appears since the Journolist and its particulars is NOT making the mainstream media’s front page or even page 25, they’re going to try to pretend their little news-rigging faux pas never happened either. Makes you proud to be an American, eh?
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
**actually, the first clear “cracks in the leftwing armor really occurred almost a full month earlier:
but Tucker Carlson’s new blogsite The Daily Caller (dailycaller.com) was so new and so little-known that it was quite awhile before the story went viral on conservative websites, talk radio and FOXNews. This is the story that broke open the leak in the dike:
I ALSO HAVE PICTURE OF THEM. THEY ALL WORK FOR ME AND ARE DISGUSTED WITH THESE FALSE CLAIMS THAT THOUSANDS OF BLACKS ARE UNHAPPY WITH WHITES REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS OR THAT RACISM AGAINST BLACKS EVEN STILL EXISTS IN AMERICA.
*
EACH ONE IS WILLING TO SAY THAT THEY HAVE NOT BEEN MISTREATED BY ANYONE WHITE SINCE DISCRIMINATION BECAME ILLEGAL.
*
THEY ALSO FEEL THAT AFFIRMATIVE ACTION HAS NEVER HELPED THEM AND THAT IT ACTUALLY PREVENTED THEM FROM BEING PROMOTED AFTER MORE THAN 20 YEARS EACH OF WORKING FOR OUR ORGANIZATION.
*
THEY ALL FEEL THAT MOST OF THEIR PROBLEMS AND SETBACKS THAT THEY AND OTHER BLACKS HAVE EXPERIENCED WAS THE RESULT OF ANTAGONISTIC ACTS BY THAT COMMUNIST DR. MARTIN LUTER KING, JR.
*
WHO CAN HELP THEIR POINTS OF VIEW BEING SHARED ON THE TEA PARTY'S HOMEPAGE?
*
THIS IS POWER STUFF!!
Kenya's Answer Again, "Butt out, Barack!"
For the second time in five years, Barack Obama has sought to influence the future of Kenya. For the second time in five years, Kenyans have said, “Butt out, Barack!” But, of course, Barack still continues along the path of evil . . . alas, alas.
Your tax dollars from Uncle Sam have recently been proposed by one BHO, Jr. for the august purpose of bringing abortion to Kenya despite the fact that Kenyans, men and women, are virulently opposed. $23 million American dollars have been spent on the “Kenya Constitution Vote.” In Nairobi, the country’s capital, the constitution referendum, requiring among other things the legalization of abortion in the country, has received funds from the U.S. taxpayer for this constitutional election while promising much more money IF the referendum passes . . . in effect this is an effort to bribe Kenya to pass a new constitution whose main change is the inclusion of abortion.
Rep. Chris Smith of New Jersey cited a U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, report estimating over $23 million in U.S. funds have been spent on the referendum, and overtly support the abortion law. The problem? Two American laws have been violated.
1) It’s against U.S. law for taxpayer funds in any fashion to be used to influence foreign elections. “Under no circumstances should the U.S. government take sides,” said Smith at a news conference earlier. “But, that is precisely what the Obama administration has done.” Smith and other lawmakers accuse the Obama administration of offering incentives to Kenya to approve the controversial new constitution, promising that passage would “allow money to flow” into the nation's coffers.
2) Another federal law known as the Siljander Amendment makes it spefically illegal for the U.S. government to lobby on abortion in other countries. While the U.S. clearly should not be interfering and definitely NOT backing either the ‘yea’ or the ‘nay’ factions; and (by the Siljander Amendment) clearly never should be backing abortion in Kenya or any other country . . . the Obama administration has taken to openly backing the pro-abortionists.
1) It’s against U.S. law for taxpayer funds in any fashion to be used to influence foreign elections. “Under no circumstances should the U.S. government take sides,” said Smith at a news conference earlier. “But, that is precisely what the Obama administration has done.” Smith and other lawmakers accuse the Obama administration of offering incentives to Kenya to approve the controversial new constitution, promising that passage would “allow money to flow” into the nation's coffers.
2) Another federal law known as the Siljander Amendment makes it spefically illegal for the U.S. government to lobby on abortion in other countries. While the U.S. clearly should not be interfering and definitely NOT backing either the ‘yea’ or the ‘nay’ factions; and (by the Siljander Amendment) clearly never should be backing abortion in Kenya or any other country . . . the Obama administration has taken to openly backing the pro-abortionists.
Obama, in 2007, went to Kenya to back communist Raila Odinga’s failed attempt to become president. Odinga, educated in East Berlin well before the fall of the Berlin Wall, is not only a communist but was supported primarily by Muslims and more importantly by Muslim terrorists. Odinga promised Muslims in a secret document that Shariah Law would be imposed upon the country (Islam would become the official Kenyan religion and rules akin to those brought to Afghanistan by the Taliban would be imposed on all its citizens) despite the fact that Christianity (47%) is the single largest religious belief in Kenya and Islam only covers about 11% of the populace. While Odinga's chances of election were always slim, they dropped precipitously when the secret Muslim accord document was made public. Odinga then signed another accord with the Muslims with watered-down provisions while claiming that the first document had never occurred and was fraudulent.
Mr. Obama, while campaigning about ten days for Odinga, is supposed to have spoken twice to purely Muslim crowds and at least one picture of the president in Muslim attire while in Kenya has been circulating the internet for almost three years. Much controversy arose including supposedly valid e-mails discovered immediately after the election purportedly from Obama to Odinga advising that if he lost the election to claim voting fraud and then to resort to violence and extort a position in the government . . . which is precisely what happened. Muslim rioters attacked Christians and Christian churches inflicting arson, murder, rape and maiming upon the Christian populace and eventually the re-elected President offered Odinga the newly created “prime minister” position which Odinga now holds.
The “dreams” implicit in Mr. Obama’s first autobiography “Dreams from My Father” can perhaps be represented best by:
http://www.politico.com/static/PPM41_eastafrica.html
in which “scientific socialism” a.k.a. “communism” for Kenya is discussed as well as such enlightening concepts such as “100% taxation,” confiscation of private lands and private businesses, confiscation of foreign businesses, redistribution of wealth now in Kenyan White and Asian hands into Black ones, etc., etc. Apparently, our president not only wants to bring us communism, he aims to do it to Kenya also.
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
Obama and NAACP Deliberately
Counter-Productive to Race Harmony?
Let’s get one thing straight, when it comes to Andrew Breitbart’s recently released video: Shirley Sherrod was never the story although a lot of people assumed she was. The real story was, and still is the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). Three things are very clear here . . . recently . . . .
A) The NAACP had just held a meeting in which a key speaker was allowed to praise a preacher and his thug friends who had just been arrested for beating up a Black entrepreneur selling “The audacity of DOPE” buttons. The man had made a fortune selling Obama buttons in 2008, but misjudged his audience when he began selling buttons showing Obama smoking a joint (marijuana cigarette, if you’ve been off the planet for half a century). The speaker was cheered loudly as he repeatedly called the victim “an Uncle Tom” and praised his assailants.
B) Without one iota of proof, the NAACP has once again
joined the Democrats and Obama for the umpteenth time in calling the TEA Party a “racist” group. The NAACP has made its career over the last half century calling Whites “racists devils” and this latest charge happened despite the fact that in the face of claims that the “N-word” was used by TEA Partiers “up to twenty-three times” against Black congressmen on the day that the Obamacare bill passed, it never happened. Breitbart has offered $100,000 to anyone who can show up with indisputable video proof that the N-word was used at all, even once that day. So far despite all the cameras and video devices on site, no one has come forward to prove the event happened. Of course, supposedly one Black congressman said he was “spat upon” but no video of that footage has occurred either, making critical minds think that spitting incident never happened either. Breitbart’s money is still in his bank account.
C) Now to the video itself, Sherrod herself was apparently a terrible victim in her youth when her father was, she said, killed by a White southern man and justice was never done. That was left out. Then later (in the 43-minute speech which the NAACP had recorded in its entirety) she talks about her epiphany that it “wasn’t about black and white at all” or at least not mainly about black and white but rather about helping the poor regardless of race. In other words her epiphany was that she learned how to do her job. Part of that was left out. What was actually left in the video segment? What was left in was while she was talking, the NAACP membership (which did NOT know where the speech and her story were going) was tittering and laughing and giving virtual “Hallelujah, Girl!” treatment to the speech as she was talking about a very uneasy interracial contact in her job with a White man who “thought he was superior to me.” That in a nutshell was the story, the NAACP reaction to the apparently racist story (early in her talk) was uniquely racist for an organization that claims to be seeking equal footing for all races. Notice the parallels between the NAACP reaction in paragraph A above and this paragraph. In the rest of the 43-minute speech, not revealed by Breitbart, were ten minutes of rants against Bush, Republicans and TEA Party members for racism without giving any evidence to back up her charges revealed Ms. Sherrod and her NAACP audience to be absolute reverse-racists.
The most clear and obvious statistics about racism in this country are that 1) Democrat Barack Obama received more White votes and a larger percentage of White votes in 2008 than John Kerry did in 2004 or Al Gore did in 2000, roughly 48%, meanwhile 2) John Mc Cain, the Republican nominee, received only around 4.4 % of Black votes. Those single facts more than any other propelled Barack Obama into office with a 7% edge in the popular vote. In other words, 3) Whites in 2008 were roughly eleven times more likely to cross racial lines in casting their votes then Blacks were.
Rajjpuut suggests that presumably 90-95% of the Whites who voted against Obama and 100% of the Blacks who voted for Mc Cain in 2008 did so for objective dislike of socialism, big spending and high taxes rather than for racial reasons. Today, 55% of Americans now label Obama a “socialist,” yet despite his miserable performance as president, 84% of Blacks still support Barack Obama. Without that support from Blacks, Obama’s overall positive job performance would stand around 36%. Who then are the racists?
To clear the air, here are some side-facts you might be interested in: Rajjpuut, a Libertarian, did NOT vote for Barack Obama because after reading “Dreams from My Father,” and listening to his speeches and going deep into research into his past voting; into the character of his mother Stanley Ann Dunham; grandfather Stanley Armour Dunham; and Barak (no ‘c’) Hussein Obama, Sr. his Kenyan birth-father . . . after that research, Rajjpuut rightly decided that Obama was at least a highly-exuberant socialist but far more likely an abject communist.
The word “prejudice” refers to pre-judging a situation, person, etc. without having all the facts (without doing your homework or research). When that prejudice is along the lines of race or color then the word “racist” is applicable. When the so-called “prevailing direction” of race hatred is breached then “reverse-racism” occurs.
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) has today become what it says it fears: a group of racists, or more properly a group of reverse-racists. While some liberated Blacks talk about the NAACP as “becoming increasingly irrelevant,” the truth is that the NAACP has for several years now has become a monstrous impediment on the road to better race relations. The biggest impediment on that road, however, is Barack Obama. Our “post-racial” president is either personally a racist or impersonally (for political advantage) the most highly visible race-baiter in America’s history . . . or most likely both.
Emphasizing specifics, the NAACP is a racist organization because unlike the great Martin Luther King, Jr., the NAACP judges Whites on their skin color not by the content of their character; and Barack Obama who seems to be doing the same thing is most likely judging voters on their stance for him or against him and using that prejudice as motivation for calling them “racists” to weaken, he hopes, the strength of their political opposition to him and the will of others to unite against him.
While Rajjpuut throws brickbats around, Shirley Sherrod is also a huge impediment to better race relations . . . a politically-incorrect fact that no one seems to be mentioning since the public-hijinks the other day by Shirley’s former employer the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Ms. Sherrod, is also, outside of her being a reverse-racist (she has labeled all Republicans and the TEA Party as racists much like Obama has, something called a ‘sewer’ or perhaps ‘suer,’ someone who likes to sue in the hopes of achieving monetary gain . . . she will be most likely suing the USDA for unlawful termination (her second big suit) and has called Breitbart “someone I’d like to get even with.” She should, if justice prevails, lose the suits, because her former employer has apologized publicly and publicly offered her a better job than she had earlier, but this is somewhat beside the point.
Ms. Sherrod, the NAACP and President Obama can all be lumped into the same boat, they are prejudiced against Whites who are not prejudiced for forced Black equality. Read that again, if necessary, for it is a key truth, no one except a few Black TEA Party members seems to be talking about. Democrats as a whole (and the NAACP as a subset of perhaps 95% of Democrats) seem to come at the world of race seeing the Black as a victim and someone the government needs to throw money at . . . . hence programs such as “Affirmative Action” which are merely institutionalized reverse-discrimination. As Martin Luther King, Jr. emphasized, equality of opportunity is the only opportunity that matters. Equality of everything (socialism, Marxism) such as Mr. Obama wants to force down our throats might actually work, to put all Blacks and all Whites and all others into uniform poverty at a level much, much lower than the average American Black now faces. Mr. Obama knows this for a fact and admitted as much several times.
During one of the candidate debates, the moderator gave an example of an economic fact and then asked Obama. “Since it’s been proved that anytime personal and business taxes on the highest earners goes above 28%, the nation is then threatened with recession, should we raise these taxes above 28%?”
Without hesitating, Mr. Obama said, “I’m interested in ‘fairness.’” There’s your blessed socialistic equality for you: everybody in the same leaky boat . . . this is why Mr. Obama has been working at cross-purposes to the economic best-interests of the American people . . . so that he can put everybody in the same leaky boat when we all know that the ‘rising tide lifts all boats’ and that’s where to put one’s economic emphasis: on making the country more prosperous as a whole. America’s poorest are wealthier than roughly 86% of the world’s people. Americans, Black or White, living below the poverty line are wealthier than 93% of the world’s people . . . the key, then is to lift the poverty line by say 60% rather than dropping more Americans into much-ballyhooed equality below that old poverty line. Racism used as a political tool by the NAACP and Mr. Obama for political ends is counter-productive of all worthy goals along those lines and a divisive factor preventing Americans from working together.
Martin Luther King, Jr. led the breakthrough for Blacks and all minorities back in the early 60’s, risking his very life and the lives of his followers to do so. It’s time for Blacks to stop playing the racism cards and the victim cards. It’s time for Whites to stop playing the guilt card against other Whites. It’s time for folks to follow that old Chinese encouragement and gung ho . . . “work together” for the betterment of themselves and their families and their country. Folks like Clarence Thomas and the TEA Party's Blacks and Hispanics are doing far more for race relations than virtually anyone since Martin Luther King, Jr.
Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
This has been one unbelievable week, with everything being thrown at tea partiers just to see what would stick. In this administration, when you think the past week has been unbelievable -- along comes another one just as earth shaking. But, this past week has been one of the most vile.
A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON TEA PARTIES
...they focus more on principles than policies
With the fall elections on the horizon I would like to share my concern regarding the strength of the Republican leadership. It looks like things are shaping up to place a large number of conservatives in the house and a few more in the Senate. As in the past these newcomers get swept up in the "establishment" or recently described as the "ruling class". In order for our country to be saved this cannot be allowed to happen. The newly elected conservatives must take no prisoners and take charge. Pressure needs to be brought on the Republican leadership, including senators and representatives. These weak-kneed people depend on Rush, Sean and Mark Levin to do there work for them. They, themselves, should be holding press conferences and screaming at microphones but, as part of the ruling class they don't. Why can't the Tea Party develop a 5 star rating system for the current incumbents as well as candidates? This rating could follow these individuals where ever they go by posting next to their face in print, on line and on TV. Comming up with the litmus test on issues is easy and those in office all ready have voting records to rate them. Those running for office would be subject to where they stand on the defined issues like the incumbents and thus rate them.
It is time to drive fear in the hearts of such leaders as McCain, Bohner, McConnel, Gram, Romney, Snow and the list goes on and on. If the new conservatives are not allowed to be in a position to reverse what has been passed, like health care it's over. I wish Rush, Sean, etc. would bring more pressure on "the leadership" by asking "you finally have a chance of to give voters a reason to vote for conservatives why aren't you doing your part?" and pound it in day after day.
AMERICAN CITIZENS ARE RUNNING OUT OF FUNDS, LOSING THERE HOUSE, LOSING THERE CREDIT, AND
CAN NOT FEED THERE KIDS. MOST CASES IT IS NOT THERE DOING!
AFTER ABOUT A YEAR AND ONE HALF NOW. WITH ALL
THE BULL. WHERE IS THE HELP FROM THE BANKS AND WASHINGTON, D.C.? NOW JULY 22, 2010.
Author: Brian D. Hill
Source: USWGO Alternative News
Note: The tactic is the same as the ones used by players on Big Brother TV Show where people build alliances to get father in the gameto back stab those not in the alliance and then betray the alliance totry to win a million dollars.
It is scary how Obama backed by Globalists is using the NAACP, and pretty much every month the Obama Administration is using racismto force his agenda against all Americans. Racism is a good way todivide and conquer and pit us off against each other.
According to a Resolution passed in the NAACP by those that are ignorantly supporting the Globalist Regime including Obama, the TeaParty Movement is declared a racist movement and that the NAACP seems tobegun it's war against the Tea Party Movement. Could the real reasonbe why is because the Tea Party may actually become another PoliticalParty which will knock off the Democrat Republican Monopoly which willset back the globalist plans for dissolving America and turning it into athird world cesspit. If this is all true will they rebuild up Americaagain as a communist regime where free speech is silenced and protestscause our Government to roll in the Big Tanks and crackdowns just likeduring the 1989 Tiananmen Square protest massacre.
The very reason Obama is using racism to divide us up is also to help build a huge alliance much like a gang that believes so many lies fromthe Pentagon that they will kill anybody that speaks against thePresident. That's also why Obama talked about having a private securityforce that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded. IfObama wants to become a dictator like Hitler and have his ownNazi-style forces, aka an Obamanation Alliance he has to spread outlies and racism to gather soldiers for his private security force toget ready to fight and kill the opposition. Already foreign troops are training on American soil to take on tea parties and confiscate guns. Also because of Obama's falling approval ratings a Top Clinton official stated that Obama needs a Terrorist attack to save his approval ratings.
So according to the NAACP's incorrect assumption that the Tea Parties are only dominated by one race and no other race can join in, and thatthey only dislike Obama's policies for only one reason, cause of hiscolor of skin. That's a total lie because I know for a fact that legalimmigrants have a problem with illegal immigrants are coming into ourcountry so it isn't racism like the movie Machete makes it out to be, Iknow for a fact that the Tea Parties actually have all of the humanrace and that they are not racist while the media lies and snips outcertain parts to make out like it's a racial cult to demonize the TeaParties.
The media always just like buzzards pick and choose what footage is left for the little people to salvage. They eat the footage where allpeople come together to fight corrupt Government no matter what gender,no matter what color, everybody comes together to say they had enoughof Big Government telling them what to do all the time, and instead themedia buzzards leave the footage to use against them and makes outlike the Tea Parties are racist in order to jumpstart the Presidentsfalling approval ratings.
In fact to further debunk the racism allegations by the NAACP we found that Lloyd Marcus a Tea Party spokesperson spoke against the NAACP Resolution that the entire Tea Party Political group was racist.
In fact Lloyd Marcus said this is his song "They try to call you racist, because you disagree! It's just another one of their dirtytricks to silence you and me"
I agree with him that the Obama Administration is using racism because they want to silence the American dream and disagree with theTea parties, just as the Bush Administration was using mainly Terrorismbecause he disagreed with the Constitutionalists.
So I welcome anybody that will stand up against propaganda by the Federal Government and the Pentagon.
Lloyd Marcus, Orly Taitz, Alex Jones, all good tea party members, Bill Randall, Dale Robertson, and many others are working hard to debunk the propaganda that thecurrent Administration aka the Obama Administration is bringing forthagainst the Opposition.
I have interviewed many and all thinks that the race card or demonization of the Tea party is simply to build a power base. Hitlerand the Nazis used propaganda to build their regime and the same will beplayed by Obama to build up America as a Police State for the NewWorld Order.
We read "Rules for Radicals", "STORM" and now we have a new discovery "Weatherman Manifesto"
Yes, GB found the 1969 blue print to an American Marxist/Socialist Revolution (Oops, Fundament Transformation of America). He wastes no time; started reviewing it on radio today. More to come and we can follow his reveal.
You can find the link on glennbeck.com however you can click on the link below to gain access to the document. When you get to the archive.org site you must register to use their resources. Once registered it’s easy, find the document, pick text or PDF and print (save or put in favorites). "The truth will sent you free, but first it will make you miserable" Thanks Glenn!
This will blow your mind! Marxists (Oops, New Left) are following it today. Yes, after 40+ years they’re back on track….. GrizzlyMama
You Don't Need A Weatherman To Know Which Way The Wind Blows
Submitted by Karin Asbley, Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, John Jacobs, Jeff Jones, Gerry Long, Home Machtinger, Jim Mellen, Terry Robbins, Mark Rudd and Steve Tappis.
From /New Left Notes/, June 18, 1969
I. International Revolution The contradiction between the revolutionary peoples of Asia, Africa and Latin America and the imperialists headed by the United States is the principal contradiction in the contemporary world. The development of this contradiction is promoting the struggle of the people of the whole world against US imperialism and its lackeys. Lin Piao, Long Live the Victory of People's War! People ask, what is the nature of the revolution that we talk about- Who will it be made by, and for, and what are its goals and strategy-
Click here to access full document: http://www.archive.org/details/YouDontNeedAWeathermanToKnowWhichWayTheWindBlows_925
Repeatedly saying, “I am the job’s president,” “I’m a true friend of small business,” “I have the best interests of America’s Business at heart,” “My administration is fully-committed to fostering a climate supporting the business community,” etc., etc., ad nauseum . . . repeatedly spewing words, Mr. President, that are belied by vicious and repeated haranguing from the other side of your mouth . . . and belied more importantly, by a host of anti-business actions since Inauguration Day -- it just doesn’t wash . . . .
Item: If President Obama’s “six-month” moratorium on offshore drilling goes into effect, the eventual economic effect of his moratorium, will in all probability utterly dwarf the economic effect of the spill itself. All the Gulf state governor’s have called the moratorium hasty, ill-conceived and likely to seriously undercut their states’ recovery.
ITEM: Mr. Obama frankly told the San Francisco Chronicle his “energies policies will bankrupt the coal industry.” He has also repeatedly declared his cap and trade plan will “necessarily make the price of electricity skyrocket.” Threatening to bankrupt essential industries? Threatening to make the price of the most fundamental aspect of any business “skyrocket”? This is no way to create business confidence or a supportive business atmosphere.
ITEM: Obama has promised to reinstitute on January 1, 2011, all the tax cuts and tax amnesties instituted by the Bush administration. Spending by this administration has dwarfed that of all previous administrations. Rising taxes and snowballing government spending has always been a recipe for economic shutdown.
ITEM: consider the financial overhaul “Reform” bill just signed into law, Obama said, “Would stop all bailout’s forever.” Actually, the concept of “too big to fail” is written ingloriously right into that law and guarantees that such bailouts will become a way of life. Thus all big (too big to fail) businesses are free to take the most unwise risks imaginable and thus maximize their chances of huge profits while always having that government safety net below them that he just signed into law. Small business can fail while big business canNOT; Big business can gun for huge profits at no risk which would bankrupt small businesses.
ITEM: consider again the financial overhaul “Reform” bill just signed into law, the original problem besetting the country was actually a sub-prime lending crisis brought about largely by ACORN abuse (Barack Obama was an ACORN lawyer shaking down lending companies) and its effect upon agencies like Freddy Mac and Frannie Mae and HUD (housing urban development agency). HUD in 1995 under weaker versions of the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act granted 44% of all their housing loans to people who objectively could NOT afford to repay the mortgage. (Carter’s CRA ’77 was expanded to include Freddie and Fanny in ’92; twice expanded in 1995 and finally expanded on steroids in 1998 -- these last three moves all under Bill Clinton). By 2005 52% of all HUD loans were made to people who objectively were not fiscally eligible for the loans given to them including illegal aliens, people without jobs, and some people without even a rental history. So how were these fundamental problems addressed by the “reform” bill? These problems were NOT addressed at all. Not one single change to HUD, Fanny Mae nor Freddy Mac is found in the 2,300 page bill. In fact, the laws that did us in, all five of them, are still on the books.
ITEM: consider again the financial overhaul “Reform” bill just signed into law, hundreds of “directives” are required by the new law . . . directives not yet written; directives not yet written by regulators not yet hired. Once again a monstrous bill (2,300 pages) has been passed and no one actually knows what’s in it, or what it does, or how it does it. This is gross uncertainty, Mr. Obama. Legitimate business never thrives under uncertain conditions.
ITEM: consider again the financial overhaul “Reform” bill just signed into law, the bill itself is self-contradictory in numerous places implying that execution and control could be under this federal agency or that one or this other one or perhaps under a couple of them or even all three of them. More uncertainty for businesses.
ITEM: consider again the financial overhaul “Reform” bill just signed into law, one thing is certain, the bill is going to be a nightmare for business offices to deal with . . . tons of paperwork, tons of bureaucracy . . . all at huge costs to businesses in time, salaries, repeated efforts, etc. A nasty certainty for business.
ITEM: consider Obamacare’s so-called health care “reform,” more directives not written by more bureaucrats not all hired yet. 3,300 pages worth of newness, including almost 390 brand new government agencies created (FDR’s entire presidency spawned only 40 new government agencies). Uncertainty for the next eight years (when the final shoe drops as Obamacare is phased in) is horrible for business.
ITEM: again consider Obamacare’s so-called health care “reform,” 390 new government agencies means a horrific and an incredible ultra-bureaucratic bombing of businesses . . . the likely paperwork snowstorm is sure to be very expensive of time and money and trouble.
ITEM: again consider Obamacare’s so-called health care “reform,” ooops, it’s going to increase the deficits, the national debt and the problems for the country, not a good atmosphere for business to operate under.
ITEM: again consider Obamacare’s so-called health care“reform,”
health care insurance, as we now know it, is effectively wiped out by 2018 . . . in other words, government interference has consumed and by overbearing bureaucracy, utterly and negatively transformed an entire American business industry. That is certain to invoke the notion, "Are we next? More threat and more uncertainty for business.
Item: again consider Obamacare’s so-called health care “reform,” it is now 100% certain that “elective” abortion is covered by Obamacare as shown by the first two Obamacare offices opened up in New Mexico and in Pennsylvania. Based upon President Obama’s signed paper for Michigan Representative Bart Stupak swearing that the longtime federal policy of NOT funding abortions would continue with Obamacare, then since it clearly appears abortions are among the very first conditions covered by Obamacare, somebody lied and businesses don’t operate well under despotic, lying governments . . . ever.
ITEM: again consider Obamacare’s so-called health care “reform,” it does nothing for improving health. It does nothing to lower health care costs. It merely sticks 390 new government agencies between doctor and patient. It is, in short, a nightmare supposedly designed to help American citizens and American business . . . but actually just a way to grab control of the pulse of America . . . business doesn’t operate well under devious government control . . . ever.
ITEM: returning to the matter of the Obama six-month offshore drilling moratorium, Mr. Obama has had two of his six-month moratoriums set aside by federal judges and is now involved in a third such moratorium he’s issued . . . what Rajjpuut would call ‘sleazy lawyer slow-down shenanigans,’ (even putting the horrible effect on the Gulf economy as each of the now operating well goes out of business and drillers eventually return in five or ten years) get a clue Mr. Obama, businesses don’t operate well under that kind of Washington arrogance and sleaze.
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
In a time of such unrest, it is distressing no clear figure has emerged that conservatives can get excited about, lift their spirits and throw their support in the ring. So far, it's the "been there, done that" crowd, and after the disasterous 2008 campaign, conservatives are not jumping on the bandwagon for any of them.
....they (GOP) must be willing to detail specific alternatives to the Obama agenda
Shirley Sherrod said, "I was struggling with the fact that so many black people had lost their farmland, and here I was faced with helping a white person save their land."
Initially, she said, “‘I didn't give him the full force of what I could do’ and only gave him enough help to keep his case progressing. But eventually, she said, his situation ‘opened my eyes’ that whites were struggling just like blacks, and helping farmers wasn't so much about race but was ‘about the poor versus those who have.’"
The full video of Sherrod's speech showed that while she took some shots at conservatives and spoke of continued racial inequities, she focused on encouraging blacks, particularly the younger generation, to do more to help themselves.
The Father of America, George Washington, was a slave owner. In his day, as a slave owner, you were a good Christian. You are still a good Christian if you believe all Jews are going to hell. If you are a member of Reverend Wright’s Christian church, you believe most white people are going to hell. President Obama was a member of Reverend Wright’s church for 20 years.
A good Christian, after having stated that I’m psychic, told me that God never communicates with psychics. Another good Christian called me the anti-Christ. Another good Christian called me a secular humanist. A secular humanist is one who promotes human values without specific allusion to religious doctrine.
President Obama says he is a Roosevelt Democrat. Roosevelt, during World War II, turned away two shiploads of Jews trying to escape Nazi death camps. Roosevelt interned all Japanese Americans during World War II. Roosevelt favored unions that barred blacks. One of the Democrats’ greats, Senator Robert Byrd, was an official in the K.K.K. before he was a senator.
The emancipator of America’s slaves, Abraham Lincoln, was a Republican, but ninety percent of blacks vote Democrat. White slave owners stigmatized blacks. Democrats keep blacks stigmatized by handing them a pittance for their votes. If Democrats want to help blacks, don’t give them a pittance. Give them a leg up.
Yesterday, Glenn Beck reminded me that Eisenhower, in a speech, citing the military-industrial complex, warned America that our liberty was in peril. It is reported that a UFO landed at Edwards Air Force Base during an Eisenhower visit to nearby Palm Springs on February 20, 1954. Aliens that looked human but not exactly, and reportedly spoke English, informed Eisenhower that they wanted to start an educational program for the people of Earth. Were I an alien, I think I would be amazed at earthling beliefs. It comes to me that the education concerned our belief system.
Since long before recorded history, man has looked to the heavens and found gods. Very few Americans know the New Age god born in September, 1925, the month and year of my birth. Physicist Werner Heisenberg published the uncertainty principle, the forerunner of quantum mechanics—and the atom bomb. From reports I’ve received, the atom bomb is of particular interest to extraterrestrials.
By looking externally for God, man has found many gods. All the trouble in the world can be traced back to looking externally for God. Quantum physicists look at the microcosmic and find a god that is scientifically provable, not directly, but by deduction. That’s a scientific no-no, by rote, not logic. In the law, you can prove something by deduction, and as well in religion. We build houses of cards from habit.
America has built a military-industrial complex. It took big money to make America the mightiest military power on earth. Money goes where money flows. This is what concerned Eisenhower, and quite likely the aliens who allegedly spoke with Eisenhower. It is all too obvious that we are not getting the truth from the military or the politicians.
The individual’s power is limited. The more the power, the less the limitation. Roosevelt Democrats believe government has an inherent duty to the individual, in and of itself transferring power from individual to government.
I’ve nothing to lose and everything to gain by accepting the scientifically proven god. By looking within for my answers, all of my dreams have come true. Like aliens apparently think—that we are in peril—I think we must be reminded that we can’t continue with faith in our fathers. We need to be reeducated to understand that we, individually, have an increasing purpose.
we are smarter than the liberals. immigration debates are winnable. so is this matter involving the naacp.
osted by Rajjpuut's Folly on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 8:20:22 PM
Hopefully, the next congress and all the congresses to come will reinstitute integrity into the House and Senate. Over the years Rajjpuut has received numerous e-mails dealing with the subject of congressional term limits. The last suggestions were pretty decent . . . so with a few deft adjustments, here is Rajjpuut’s . . . .
Term Limits and Political Reform Act**
for 2011
for 2011
I. Term Limits:
President ten years maximum (for example: maximum two years during the term of a deceased president + two full four-year presidential terms.
Congress twelve years maximum, for example:
A. Two Six-year Senate terms
B. Six Two-year House terms
C. One Six-year Senate term and three Two-Year House terms
D. Some other combination
2. No Tenure / No Pension for most politicians.
A Congressman collects a salary only while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office except those serving a full dozen years who would get a pension the equivalent of 1/20 of what a 20 year congressman now receives.
3. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security. All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people. In the case of the 12-year congressmen, they are entitled to double-dip.
4. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.
5. Congress will no longer be allowed to vote itself a pay raise. During inflationary years (they create inflation) congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI increase or +2% deviation.
6. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.
7. Congress must abide by all laws they impose on the American people.
8. All contracts (including pensions) with past and present Congressmen are null and void effective 1/1/12. The American people did not make these contracts with Congressmen. Congressmen made all these contracts for themselves therefore they are against the spirit of the Constitution.
2. No Tenure / No Pension for most politicians.
A Congressman collects a salary only while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office except those serving a full dozen years who would get a pension the equivalent of 1/20 of what a 20 year congressman now receives.
3. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security. All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people. In the case of the 12-year congressmen, they are entitled to double-dip.
4. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.
5. Congress will no longer be allowed to vote itself a pay raise. During inflationary years (they create inflation) congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI increase or +2% deviation.
6. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.
7. Congress must abide by all laws they impose on the American people.
8. All contracts (including pensions) with past and present Congressmen are null and void effective 1/1/12. The American people did not make these contracts with Congressmen. Congressmen made all these contracts for themselves therefore they are against the spirit of the Constitution.
9. On the positive side, the congress will have much more time off and time to visit with their constituents because, while true “emergency” sessions can be called, the congress will meet for only 90 days each year and be a part-time entity much like the original design of a part-time legislature by the Founding Fathers.
Ya'll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
**Actually Rajjpuut would prefer that a constitutional amendment be passed, if necessary by petitions within the American people, if the congress hasn’t the integrity to do it by itself (and require ratification by the American people).
Ya'll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
**Actually Rajjpuut would prefer that a constitutional amendment be passed, if necessary by petitions within the American people, if the congress hasn’t the integrity to do it by itself (and require ratification by the American people).
MRS. SHIRLEY SHERROD, DIRECTOR USDA STATE OF GEORGIA. Was giving a speech to the NAACP. Was telling of a case in 1986. ( 28 years ago ) Then after got a call from the White House, and was asked too resign ! She was told that she had made RACIST remarks. All Ms. Sherrod was doing, was telling as it was 28 years ago. And how it is in 2010. She is not a racist, and doing a good job. Helping the have's and the have not farmers in Georgia. Then after it was in the media, THE NAACP did not back her !
